Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33743512›Full record

ArticleForensic science international2021

Prevalence and correlates of spitting on police officers: New risks in the COVID era.

Jared Strote, Joey Warner, Robert M Scales, Matthew J Hickman

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Forensic science international, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
8.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jared StroteUniversity of Washington, 1959 NE Pacific Ave Box 356123, Seattle, WA 98195, USA. Electronic address: strote@uw.edu.
Joey WarnerUniversity of Washington, 1959 NE Pacific Ave Box 356123, Seattle, WA 98195, USA. Electronic address: jwerner3@uw.edu.
Robert M ScalesPolice Strategies, LLC, 13197 Madison Ave NE, Bainbridge Island, WA 98110, USA. Electronic address: bob@policestrategies.com.
Matthew J HickmanSeattle University, 901 12th Ave, Seattle, WA 98122, USA. Electronic address: hickmanm@seattleu.edu.
University of Washington · USJustice & Security Strategies · USSeattle University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesSpitting is an occupational hazard of police work with increased risk due to the COVID-19 pandemic. We sought to calculate the prevalence of spitting on police officers in use of force incidents, as well as the demographic and situational factors associated with spitting.

methodsData on spitting were compiled from more than 10,000 use of force incidents occurring at 81 agencies in eight different states in the US.

resultsSpitting occurred in 3.6% of cases. Female and younger subjects and those using drugs and/or alcohol are more likely to spit on officers. Spitting is more likely to occur in incidents of longer duration, when officers use less force relative to subject resistance, when subjects are assaultive or engage in self-harm, and when subjects are hobbled.

conclusionsSpitting on officers is common and may now constitute a significant work hazard. Implications for police practice are discussed.

Indexed as

Law EnforcementPoliceSalivaAdultCOVID-19FemaleHumansMalePrevalenceRetrospective StudiesUnited StatesCOVIDDisease transmissionLaw enforcementSpitting

Identifiers

PMID33743512
PMCPMC9758598
OpenAlexW3135138226

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.