Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33743143›Full record

ReviewLa Radiologia medica2021

Radial Scar: a management dilemma.

Charlotte Marguerite Lucille Trombadori, Anna D'Angelo, Francesca Ferrara, Angela Santoro, Paolo Belli, Riccardo Manfredi

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in La Radiologia medica, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Approach to Nonmass Lesions on Breast Ultrasound.The Indian journal of radiology & imaging · 2024
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Charlotte Marguerite Lucille Trombadori *Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Dipartimento Universitario di Scienze Radiologiche ed Ematologiche, Largo Francesco Vito 1, 00168, Rome, Italy. charlotte.trombadori@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1238-9688
Anna D'Angelo *UOC Radiologia Generale ed Interventistica Generale, Area Diagnostica per Immagini, Dipartimento Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy. anna.dangelo@policlinicogemelli.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5970-1010
Francesca FerraraUniversità Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Dipartimento Universitario di Scienze Radiologiche ed Ematologiche, Largo Francesco Vito 1, 00168, Rome, Italy.
Angela SantoroUOC di Gineco-patologia e Patologia Mammaria, Dipartimento per la Salute della Donna e del Bambino e della Salute Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Paolo BelliUOC Radiologia Generale ed Interventistica Generale, Area Diagnostica per Immagini, Dipartimento Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Riccardo ManfrediUniversità Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Dipartimento Universitario di Scienze Radiologiche ed Ematologiche, Largo Francesco Vito 1, 00168, Rome, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4972-9500
Agostino Gemelli University Polyclinic · ITUniversità Cattolica del Sacro Cuore · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Radial scar (RS) or complex sclerosing lesions (CSL) if > 10 mm is a benign lesion with an increasing incidence of diagnosis (ranging from 0.6 to 3.7%) and represents a challenge both for radiologists and for pathologists. The digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis appearances of RS are well documented, according to the literature. On ultrasound, variable aspects can be detected. Magnetic resonance imaging contribution to differential diagnosis with carcinoma is growing. As for the management, a vacuum-assisted biopsy (VAB) with large core is recommended after a percutaneous diagnosis of RS due to potential sampling error. According to the recent International Consensus Conference, a RS/CSL lesion, which is visible on imaging, should undergo therapeutic excision with VAB. Thereafter, surveillance is justified. The aim of this review is to provide a practical guide for the recognition of RS on imaging, illustrating radiological findings according to the most recent literature, and to delineate the management strategies that follow.

Indexed as

Disease ManagementBreastBreast DiseasesCicatrixFemaleHumansMammographyB3-lesionsRadial scarRadial scar managementVacuum-assisted biopsy

Identifiers

PMID33743143
PMCPMC8154762
OpenAlexW3138625491

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.