ReviewJournal of thrombosis and thrombolysis2021
Coronary artery aneurysm presenting as acute coronary syndrome: two case reports and a review of the literature.
Review in Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Integrated multidisciplinary approach to aneurysm hemodynamic analysis: numerical simulation,Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Review
- A "giant bomb" in acute myocardial infarction due to coronary artery aneurysm: a case report.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Article
- Uncommon presentation of left main congenital coronary aneurysm: a rare case report.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Article
- "Floating" Stent in a Coronary Aneurysm Presenting as ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2023Article
- Coronary Artery Aneurysms as a Cause of Acute Coronary Syndrome Presentation - A Focused Review.Current cardiology reviews · 2023Review
- The Diagnostic Value of Combined Detection of Serum Lp-PLA2 and Hcy and Color Doppler in Elderly Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome and Effect on Endothelial Function.Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Coronary artery aneurysm (CAA) is an uncommon coronary disease, with a reported incidence in adults ranging from 0.33 to 4.9%.It is usually considered a variant of coronary artery disease (CAD). CAA is associated with thrombus formation due to abnormal laminar flow, as well as abnormal platelet and endothelial-derived pathophysiologic factors within the CAA. CAA identified in the context of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) poses several unique management challenges. Optimal antiplatelet and anticoagulant therapy is the mainstay of therapy. Percutaneous intervention for CAA is associated with complications including distal embolization of thrombus, no-reflow phenomenon, stent malposition, dissection, and rupture. There are currently no accepted guidelines to direct the management of CAA in patients presenting with ACS. Preference for conservative vs. surgical or catheter-based management is controversial. We review the literature and report different treatment strategies for two cases with both CAA and ACS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.