ArticleJournal of molecular neuroscience : MN2021
JAM2: A New Culprit at the Pathophysiology of Primary Familial Brain Calcification.
Article in Journal of molecular neuroscience : MN, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Understanding brain calcification via N-terminal acetylation at the Golgi apparatus.Brain : a journal of neurology · 2025Review
- A robust transfer learning approach for high-dimensional linear regression to support integration of multi-source gene expression data.PLoS computational biology · 2025Article
- Amount and Distribution of Intracranial Calcification in Symptomatic and Asymptomatic Primary Familial Brain Calcification.Neurology. Clinical practice · 2023Article
- A Glance at the Molecules That Regulate Oligodendrocyte Myelination.Current issues in molecular biology · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Primary familial brain calcification (PFBC) is an uncommon degenerative neurological disease that can be hereditary or sporadic, and manifests equally in both sexes and at any age. Several studies initially identified variants in four different genes as the cause of the disorder, all with an autosomal dominant inheritance pattern: SLC20A2, PDGFRB, PDGFB and XPR1. However, there have been reports of the involvement of additional genes in the autosomal recessive inheritance pattern, such as MYORG and more recently JAM2, suggesting that the deregulation of the neurovascular unit (NVU) is important in the pathogenesis of PFBC. The recent study by Schottlaender and collaborators (2020) has added new data to foster these analyses and to enable a better understanding of this underdiagnosed and intriguing neuropsychiatric condition. A great challenge now is to design a model that explains how different pathways might lead to similar neuroimaging findings but with variable clinical outcome, and with marked severity in cases linked to MYORG and JAM2. Currently available databases of detailed gene expression in different vascular cell types from the mouse brain could be used to explore a possible integrative model.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.