Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33743105›Full record

ArticleDocumenta ophthalmologica. Advances in ophthalmology2021

The electrophysiological tests in the early detection of the visual pathway dysfunction in patients with microadenoma.

Ewelina Lachowicz, Wojciech Lubiński, Wojciech Gosławski, Elżbieta Andrysiak-Mamos, Agnieszka Kaźmierczyk-Puchalska, Anhelli Syrenicz

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Documenta ophthalmologica. Advances in ophthalmology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 97% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Visual field asymmetry indices and optical coherence tomography in the differential diagnosis of glaucomatous and pituitary adenoma-related optic neuropathies.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ewelina LachowiczII Department of Ophthalmology, Pomeranian Medical University, SPSK-2, Powstańców Wlkp. 72, 70-111, Szczecin, Poland. ewelinalachowicz@wp.pl.ORCID 0000-0001-7057-0103
Wojciech LubińskiII Department of Ophthalmology, Pomeranian Medical University, SPSK-2, Powstańców Wlkp. 72, 70-111, Szczecin, Poland. lubinski@pro.onet.pl.
Wojciech GosławskiII Department of Ophthalmology, Pomeranian Medical University, SPSK-2, Powstańców Wlkp. 72, 70-111, Szczecin, Poland.
Elżbieta Andrysiak-MamosClinic of Endocrinology, Metabolic and Internal Diseases, Pomeranian Medical University, SPSK-1, Szczecin, Poland.
Agnieszka Kaźmierczyk-PuchalskaClinic of Endocrinology, Metabolic and Internal Diseases, Pomeranian Medical University, SPSK-1, Szczecin, Poland.
Anhelli SyreniczClinic of Endocrinology, Metabolic and Internal Diseases, Pomeranian Medical University, SPSK-1, Szczecin, Poland.
Pomeranian Medical University · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate the validity of electrophysiological tests in the early diagnosis of a ganglion cells and/or optic nerve dysfunction in patients with pituitary microadenoma.

methods66 eyes, from 33 patients with microadenoma with no evidence of the optic chiasm compression in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and the visual impairment in the routine ophthalmological examination, standard static perimetry (24-2 white on white) and optical coherence tomography (HD-OCT), were analysed. The pattern electroretinogram (PERG), standard pattern visual evoked potentials (PVEPs) and multichannel visual evoked potentials (mVEPs) (ISCEV standards) were performed. The results obtained from the electrophysiological tests were compared to the same number of age-matched healthy controls.

resultsStatistically significant differences between the patients with microadenoma and healthy controls were detected in all electrophysiological tests (p < 0.001). The most frequent abnormalities were observed in mVEPs (25/33 patients, 75.8%; 43/66 eyes, 65.2%). The most frequent features registered in this test were: (1°4')-an increase in the P100wave latency from uncrossed fibres (13/33 patients, 39.39%; 21/66 eyes, 31.8%) and (0°16')-an amplitude reduction of this wave from the crossed fibres (11/33 patients, 33.33%; 19/66 eyes, 28.8%). The changes in PVEPs (15/33 patients, 45.5%; 25/66 eyes, 37.9%) and PERG (10/33 patients, 30.3%; 15/66 eyes, 22.7%) were also registered. Of all the tests and parameters analysed in the study, the greatest diagnostic value in detecting the visual pathway dysfunction in this group of patients was the amplitude of P100 wave from the crossed fibres of the mVEPs (1°4') with a sensitivity of 60.6% and a specificity of 93.8%. These parameters suggest that this type of dysfunction is downstream to the chiasm and can also indicate the visual pathway dysfunction severity.

conclusionsIn patients with microadenoma, the abnormalities in the electrophysiological tests are registered even without clinical evidence of visual impairment from the routine ophthalmological examination, SAP, OCT and chiasmal compression in MRI. The mVEPs have the most significant role in the diagnosis of the visual pathway dysfunction in patients with microadenoma.

Indexed as

Evoked Potentials, VisualVisual PathwaysEarly DiagnosisElectroretinographyHumansTomography, Optical CoherenceVisual Field TestsMicroadenomaMVEPPERGPituitary tumourPVEPVisual pathway dysfunction

Identifiers

PMID33743105
PMCPMC8494703
OpenAlexW3138732660

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.