Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33743075›Full record

ReviewBrain structure & function2021

Cytoarchitectonics of the Rolandic operculum: morphofunctional ponderings.

Lazaros C Triarhou

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Brain structure & function, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Breaking (musical) boundaries by investigating brain dynamics of event segmentation during real-life music-listening.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  17. Sex-specific grey matter abnormalities in individuals with chronic insomnia.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Lazaros C TriarhouLaboratory of Theoretical and Applied Neuroscience, University of Macedonia School of Social Sciences, Humanities and Arts, Egnatia 156, 54636, Thessaloníki, Greece. triarhou@uom.edu.gr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6544-5738

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Constantin von Economo (1876-1931) had a long-standing interest in the cellular structure of the human cerebral cortex. In the present article I highlight a historical paper that von Economo published in 1930 on the cytoarchitectonics of the Rolandic operculum, an English translation of which I provide as supplementary material. I further discuss some morphofunctional aspects of the human opercular cortex from a modern perspective, as well as the clinical relevance to language dysfunctions, the operculum syndrome, and epilepsy.

Indexed as

Parietal LobeHumansCerebral cortexConstantin von Economo (1876–1931)CytoarchitectonicsFrontoparietal operculumHistory of neuroscience

Identifiers

PMID33743075

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.