Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33743055›Full record

ArticleEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2021

Minimum clinically important change for outcome scores among patients aged 75 or over undergoing lumbar spine surgery.

Kosei Nagata, Hideki Nakamoto, So Kato, Yujiro Takeshita, Naohiro Kawamura, Takashi Ono, Akiro Higashikawa, Masayoshi Fukushima, Seiichi Azuma, Nobuhiro Hara and 4 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Methodological considerations in calculating the minimal clinically important change score for the core outcome measures index (COMI): insights from a large single-centre spine surgery registry.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2024
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Comparison of Lumbar Fusion Surgical Outcomes Between Patients with Lumbar Spinal Stenosis ≥80 Versus 65-79 Years Old.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 9 institutions in 1 country.

Kosei NagataDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery and Spinal Surgery, The University of Tokyo Hospital, 7-3-1, Hongo, Bunkyo-Ku, Tokyo, 113-8655, Japan.
Hideki NakamotoDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery and Spinal Surgery, The University of Tokyo Hospital, 7-3-1, Hongo, Bunkyo-Ku, Tokyo, 113-8655, Japan.
So KatoDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery and Spinal Surgery, The University of Tokyo Hospital, 7-3-1, Hongo, Bunkyo-Ku, Tokyo, 113-8655, Japan.
Yujiro TakeshitaUniversity of Tokyo Spine Group (UTSG), 7-3-1, Hongo, Bunkyo-Ku, Tokyo, 113-8655, Japan.
Naohiro KawamuraUniversity of Tokyo Spine Group (UTSG), 7-3-1, Hongo, Bunkyo-Ku, Tokyo, 113-8655, Japan.
Takashi OnoUniversity of Tokyo Spine Group (UTSG), 7-3-1, Hongo, Bunkyo-Ku, Tokyo, 113-8655, Japan.
Akiro HigashikawaUniversity of Tokyo Spine Group (UTSG), 7-3-1, Hongo, Bunkyo-Ku, Tokyo, 113-8655, Japan.
Masayoshi FukushimaUniversity of Tokyo Spine Group (UTSG), 7-3-1, Hongo, Bunkyo-Ku, Tokyo, 113-8655, Japan.
Seiichi AzumaUniversity of Tokyo Spine Group (UTSG), 7-3-1, Hongo, Bunkyo-Ku, Tokyo, 113-8655, Japan.
Nobuhiro HaraUniversity of Tokyo Spine Group (UTSG), 7-3-1, Hongo, Bunkyo-Ku, Tokyo, 113-8655, Japan.
Hiroyuki OkaUniversity of Tokyo Spine Group (UTSG), 7-3-1, Hongo, Bunkyo-Ku, Tokyo, 113-8655, Japan.
Ko MatsudairaUniversity of Tokyo Spine Group (UTSG), 7-3-1, Hongo, Bunkyo-Ku, Tokyo, 113-8655, Japan.
Sakae TanakaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery and Spinal Surgery, The University of Tokyo Hospital, 7-3-1, Hongo, Bunkyo-Ku, Tokyo, 113-8655, Japan.
Yasushi OshimaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery and Spinal Surgery, The University of Tokyo Hospital, 7-3-1, Hongo, Bunkyo-Ku, Tokyo, 113-8655, Japan. yoo-tky@umin.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4495-1134
University of Tokyo Hospital · JPThe University of Tokyo · JPJapanese Red Cross Medical Center · JPJapan Organization of Occupational Health and Safety · JPMusashino Red Cross Hospital · JPSaitama Red Cross Hospital · JPTokyo Yamate Medical Center · JPToranomon Hospital · JPYokohama Rosai Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo elucidate the minimum clinically important change (MCIC) of the physical component summary (PCS) of the Short Form-12, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), EuroQOL-5 dimensions (EQ-5D), and the Core Outcome Measures Index (COMI) in patients aged ≥ 75 years undergoing lumbar spine surgery.

methodsWe retrospectively reviewed patients aged ≥ 75 years with degenerative lumbar spine disease who underwent lumbar spine decompression or fusion surgery within three levels between April 2017 and June 2018. We also evaluated patients aged < 75 years in the same period as reference. We evaluated the baseline and postoperative PCS, ODI, EQ-5D, and COMI scores. Patients were asked to answer an anchor question regarding health transition for MCICs using the anchor-based method.

resultsA total of 247 patients aged ≥ 75 years and 398 patients aged < 75 years were included for analysis. Of patients aged ≥ 75 years, 83.4% showed at least "somewhat improved" outcomes, while 91.0% of patients aged < 75 years reported this outcome. PCS change score was not adequately correlated to health transition in patients aged ≥ 75 years. Receiver operating characteristic curve analyses revealed MCICs of 17.8 for ODI, 0.18 for EQ-5D, and 1.6 for COMI in patients aged ≥ 75 years, and 12.7 for ODI, 0.19 for EQ-5D, and 2.3 for COMI in patients aged < 75 years.

conclusionIn patients aged ≥ 75 years, PCS may not be feasible for evaluation of health transition. The MCIC value for ODI score was higher and that for EQ-5D/COMI score was lower in patients aged ≥ 75 years, compared with those in patients aged < 75 years.

Indexed as

Disability EvaluationLumbosacral RegionHumansLumbar VertebraePain MeasurementQuality of LifeRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeEuro-quality of life-5 dimensionsThe core outcome measures indexThe minimum clinically important changeThe Oswestry disability indexThe physical component summary

Identifiers

PMID33743055
OpenAlexW3136363543

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.