Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33743051›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of colorectal disease2021

Interhospital referral of colorectal cancer patients: a Dutch population-based study.

A K Warps, M P M de Neree Tot Babberich, E Dekker, M W J M Wouters, J W T Dekker, R A E M Tollenaar, P J Tanis, Dutch ColoRectal Audit

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of colorectal disease, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

A K WarpsDepartment of Surgery and Biomedical Data Sciences, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333ZA, Leiden, Netherlands.
M P M de Neree Tot BabberichDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105AZ, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
E DekkerDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105AZ, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
M W J M WoutersDepartment of Surgery and Biomedical Data Sciences, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333ZA, Leiden, Netherlands.
J W T DekkerDepartment of Surgery, Reinier de Graaf Groep, Reinier de Graafweg 5, 2625AD, Delft, Netherlands.
R A E M TollenaarDepartment of Surgery and Biomedical Data Sciences, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333ZA, Leiden, Netherlands.
P J TanisDepartment of Surgery, Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105AZ, Amsterdam, Netherlands. p.j.tanis@amsterdamumc.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3146-3310
Dutch ColoRectal Audit

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeInterhospital referral is a consequence of centralization of complex oncological care but might negatively impact waiting time, a quality indicator in the Netherlands. This study aims to evaluate characteristics and waiting times of patients with primary colorectal cancer who are referred between hospitals.

methodsData were extracted from the Dutch ColoRectal Audit (2015-2019). Waiting time between first tumor-positive biopsy until first treatment was compared between subgroups stratified for referral status, disease stage, and type of hospital.

resultsIn total, 46,561 patients were included. Patients treated for colon or rectal cancer in secondary care hospitals were referred in 12.2% and 14.7%, respectively. In tertiary care hospitals, corresponding referral rates were 43.8% and 66.4%. Referred patients in tertiary care hospitals were younger, but had a more advanced disease stage, and underwent more often multivisceral resection and simultaneous metastasectomy than non-referred patients in secondary care hospitals (p<0.001). Referred patients were more often treated within national quality standards for waiting time compared to non-referred patients (p<0.001). For referred patients, longer waiting times prior to MDT were observed compared to non-referred patients within each hospital type, although most time was spent post-MDT.

conclusionA large proportion of colorectal cancer patients that are treated in tertiary care hospitals are referred from another hospital but mostly treated within standards for waiting time. These patients are younger but often have a more advanced disease. This suggests that these patients are willing to travel more but also reflects successful centralization of complex oncological patients in the Netherlands.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsMetastasectomyRectal NeoplasmsHospitalsHumansNetherlandsReferral and ConsultationCentralizationColorectal cancer careInterhospital referralWaiting time

Identifiers

PMID33743051
PMCPMC8195929

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.