ReviewPediatric radiology2021
Radiation use in diagnostic imaging in children: approaching the value of the pediatric radiology community.
Review in Pediatric radiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effect of shortening the fluoroscopy time audible alarm on total fluoroscopy time and reference air kerma for pediatric modified barium swallow studies.Pediatric radiology · 2026Article
- Quantifying and Contextualizing Radiation Doses in Common Pediatric Medical Imaging Examinations.Journal of pediatrics. Clinical practice · 2025Article
- Radiological imaging and interventional procedures of the thorax in children.Turk gogus kalp damar cerrahisi dergisi · 2024Review
- The role of ultrasound in necrotizing enterocolitis.Pediatric radiology · 2022Review
- Changing the practice of routine gonadal shielding during radiography: 'Y'?Pediatric radiology · 2022Article
- The cumulative radiation dose paradigm in pediatric imaging.The British journal of radiology · 2021Review
- Radiobiological risks following dentomaxillofacial imaging: should we be concerned?Dento maxillo facial radiology · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Medical imaging is foundational in the care of children, and much of the medical imaging province depends on ionizing radiation: radiography, fluoroscopy, CT and nuclear imaging. Many considerations for this imaging in children are distinct in the domains of appropriate radiation use, other factors that determine examination quality, the opportunities to engage and educate through networking, and the translation of research efforts. Given these needs, it is worth approaching the contributions and their impact by the pediatric radiology community, especially to the enhancement of this value in the care of children.
Indexed as
Identifiers
33743037What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.