Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33742737›Full record

ArticlePsycho-oncology2021

Use of digital health tools for health promotion in cancer survivors.

Henry K Onyeaka, Juliana Zambrano, Regina M Longley, Christopher M Celano, John A Naslund, Hermioni L Amonoo

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psycho-oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05349227 (Comprehensive Outcomes for After Cancer Health), which is not on this map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05349227 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Comprehensive Outcomes for After Cancer Health (COACH): the Feasibility and Impact of an MHealth Augmented Coaching Program for Self-Management in Cancer Survivors

TypeinterventionalSponsorPack HealthRan2022 to 2027Enrolled625ConditionsOvarian Cancer, Breast Cancer, Lung Cancer, Gastric CancerArmsDigital Health Coaching Program, Fitbit
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Henry K OnyeakaDepartment of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1987-0941
Juliana ZambranoDepartment of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Regina M LongleyDepartment of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Christopher M CelanoDepartment of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
John A NaslundDepartment of Global Health and Social Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Hermioni L AmonooHarvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Harvard University · USMassachusetts General Hospital · USBrigham and Women's Hospital · US

Funding

A Positive Psychology Intervention for Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplant Patients.K08CA251654 · NCI · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI AMONOO, HERMIONI L. · 2020 to 2024
$1.3M
NCI NIH HHS K08 CA251654
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveAlthough digital health tools (DHTs) are a promising alternative and effective strategy to deliver cancer care and support, their role in health promotion among cancer survivors remains relatively unexplored. We aimed to investigate the acceptability and impact of DHT for health promotion in cancer survivors.

methodsData was pooled from cycle three of the fifth edition of the Health Information National Trends Survey. Logistic regressions were conducted to evaluate differences between cancer survivors and the general population regarding ownership, usage, and perceived usefulness of DHT for health management. Regression models were used to identify sociodemographic predictors of DHT usage among cancer survivors.

resultsOverall, cancer survivors were as likely as the general population to own and use DHT (e.g., health apps, wearable devices) for their care and they were likely to find these tools beneficial in tracking their health and communicating with healthcare providers. Cancer survivors who had health applications installed on their mobile device were more likely to meet national recommendations for diet (fruit and vegetable consumption) and strength training than those without health apps. Age, income, and education level were significant sociodemographic predictors of DHT ownership and usage.

conclusionCancer survivors own and use DHT at similarly high rates to the general population, highlighting the potential for utilizing DHT to expand access and continuity of care in the growing and vulnerable oncology population. With increasing use of DHT in healthcare, future research that targets digital access disparities in cancer survivors from low SES is essential.

Indexed as

Cancer SurvivorsNeoplasmsHealth PersonnelHealth PromotionHumansOwnershipSurveys and Questionnairescancercancer survivorsdigital health toolshealth promotionmobile health applicationpsychological well-beingpsycho-oncologysmartphoneswearable devices

Identifiers

PMID33742737
PMCPMC10317047
OpenAlexW3136848649

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.