Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33742659›Full record

ReviewMilitary medicine2022

Review of Military Casualties in Modern Conflicts-The Re-emergence of Casualties From Armored Warfare.

Amir Khorram-Manesh, Krzysztof Goniewicz, Frederick M Burkle, Yohan Robinson

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Military medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Civilian pattern of injuries in armed conflicts - a systematic review.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Persistent neuropathic pain symptoms after FPV drone-related thoracic blast injury without rib fractures: a pilot observational study from the Ukraine War.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2026
    Observational
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Transposing intensive care innovation from modern warfare to other resource-limited settings.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Amir Khorram-ManeshInstitute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, Gothenburg University, Gothenburg 413 45, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-2734-5733
Krzysztof GoniewiczDepartment of Aviation Security, Military University of Aviation, Dęblin 08-521, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-4368-6850
Frederick M BurkleHarvard Humanitarian Initiative, T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Harvard University, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Yohan RobinsonInstitute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, Gothenburg University, Gothenburg 413 45, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe re-emergence of armored warfare in modern conflicts has resulted in a higher number of extremity injuries, burns, and brain injuries. Despite this dramatic increase, little is reported on the type of injuries caused and their management. This review summarizes the publicly available literature and reports on the rate and type of injuries related to armored warfare, their medical outcomes, and management limitations. MATERIALS AND

methodsThis rapid evidence review involves a systematic literature search, followed by a non-systematic literature review. The reason for choosing this approach was the inherent lack of quantitative outcome data in the literature to satisfy the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses checklist. The study also used content analysis to study all peer-reviewed articles, focusing on similarities and differences in the findings necessary to formulate tentative results. The electronic search included PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science, using the following search string: "Armored; Injuries; Mechanized; Morbidity; Mortality; War; Warfare", alone or in combination.

resultsModern conflicts are associated with higher number of extremity injuries, burns, and brain injuries among military casualties. Several publications claim that the characteristics of armored warfare and anticipated injuries in this type of warfare might require the far forward deployment of medical support supported by a reliable casualty evacuation chain. Still the quality of the available casualty data is low.

conclusionsBecause of the limited availability of reliable data or military trauma registries, up-to-date military casualty estimation remains a recognized knowledge gap, which needs to be addressed by armed forces worldwide. The future management of modern war casualties requires professional and well-trained staff in all levels, indicating a need for educational initiatives to provide both nurses and medics a greater proportion of medical care and management capabilities and responsibilities than in past conflicts.

Indexed as

Brain InjuriesBurnsMilitary PersonnelHumansRegistriesWarfare

Identifiers

PMID33742659
PMCPMC8963150

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.