Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33742549›Full record

ArticleJournal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle2021

The value of spot urinary creatinine as a marker of muscle wasting in patients with new-onset or worsening heart failure.

Paloma Pandhi, Koen W Streng, Stefan D Anker, John G Cleland, Kevin Damman, Kenneth Dickstein, Pierpaolo Pellicori, Chim C Lang, Leong Ng, Nilesh J Samani and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. A passive flow microreactor for urine creatinine test.Microsystems & nanoengineering · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 10 institutions in 9 countries.

Paloma PandhiDepartment of Cardiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-2031-2314
Koen W StrengDepartment of Cardiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Stefan D AnkerDepartment of Cardiology (CVK), Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0805-8683
John G ClelandRobertson Centre for Biostatistics & Clinical Trials Unit, University of Glasgow and Clinical Cardiology, National Heart & Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1471-7016
Kevin DammanDepartment of Cardiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-0190-2228
Kenneth DicksteinUniversity of Bergen, Stavanger University Hospital, Norway.
Pierpaolo PellicoriRobertson Institute of Biostatistics and Clinical Trials Unit, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7175-0464
Chim C LangDivision of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4530-3078
Leong NgDepartment of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leicester, Glenfield Hospital, and NIHR Leicester Cardiovascular Biomedical Research Unit, Glenfield Hospital, Leicester, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6553-5749
Nilesh J SamaniDepartment of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leicester, Glenfield Hospital, and NIHR Leicester Cardiovascular Biomedical Research Unit, Glenfield Hospital, Leicester, UK.
Faiez ZannadCHU de Nancy, Inserm CIC 1433, Université de Lorrain, CHRU de Nancy, F-CRIN INI-CRCT, Nancy, France.ORCID 0000-0001-7456-1570
Marco MetraInstitute of Cardiology, Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences and Public Health, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6691-8568
Patrick RossignolInserm, Centre d'Investigations Cliniques-Plurithématique 1433, Inserm U1116; CHRU Nancy; F-CRIN INI-CRCT Network, Université de Lorraine, Nancy, France.ORCID 0000-0001-8009-3873
Gerasimos FilippatosHeart Failure Unit, Department of Cardiology, School of Medicine, Athens University Hospital Attikon, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Dirk J van VeldhuisenDepartment of Cardiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Adriaan A VoorsDepartment of Cardiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-5417-4415
Jozine M Ter MaatenDepartment of Cardiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
University Medical Center Groningen · NLInserm · FRUniversity of Leicester · GBGerman Centre for Cardiovascular Research · DELung Institute · USNational and Kapodistrian University of Athens · GRStavanger University Hospital · NOThe Robertson Trust · GBUniversity of Brescia · ITUniversity of Dundee · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMuscle wasting and unintentional weight loss (cachexia) have been associated with worse outcomes in heart failure (HF), but timely identification of these adverse phenomena is difficult. Spot urinary creatinine may be an easily accessible marker to assess muscle loss and cachexia. This study investigated the association of urinary creatinine with body composition changes and outcomes in patients with new-onset or worsening HF (WHF).

methodsIn BIOSTAT-CHF, baseline spot urinary creatinine measurements were available in 2315 patients with new-onset or WHF in an international cohort (index cohort) and a validation cohort of 1431 similar patients from Scotland.

resultsMedian spot urinary creatinine concentrations were 5.2 [2.7-9.6] mmol/L in the index cohort. Median age was 69 ± 12 years and 73% were men. Lower spot urinary creatinine was associated with older age, lower height and weight, worse renal function, more severe HF, and a higher risk of >5% weight loss from baseline to 9 months (odds ratio = 1.23, 95% CI = 1.09-1.39 per log decrease; P = 0.001). Spot urinary creatinine was associated with Evans criteria of cachexia (OR = 1.26 per log decrease, 95% CI = 1.04-1.49; P = 0.016) and clustered with markers of heart failure severity in hierarchical cluster analyses. Lower urinary creatinine was associated with poorer exercise capacity and quality of life (both P < 0.001) and predicted a higher rate for all-cause mortality [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.27, 95% CI = 1.17-1.38 per log decrease; P < 0.001] and the combined endpoints HF hospitalization or all-cause mortality (HR = 1.23, 95% CI = 1.15-1.31 per log decrease; P < 0.001). Significance was lost after addition of the BIOSTAT risk model. Analyses of the validation cohort yielded similar findings.

conclusionsLower spot urinary creatinine is associated with smaller body dimensions, renal dysfunction, and more severe HF in patients with new-onset/WHF. Additionally, lower spot urinary creatinine is associated with an increased risk of weight loss and a poorer exercise capacity/quality of life. Urinary creatinine could therefore be a novel, easily obtainable marker to assess (risk of) muscle wasting in HF patients.

Indexed as

Heart FailureQuality of LifeAgedAged, 80 and overBiomarkersCreatinineHumansMaleMiddle AgedMusclesBiomarkersCreatinineAcute heart failureMuscle wastingUrinary creatinineWeight loss

Identifiers

PMID33742549
PMCPMC8200450
OpenAlexW3136846668

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.