Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33742482›Full record

ArticleThe European journal of neuroscience2021

Effects of affective content and motivational context on neural gain functions during naturalistic scene perception.

Anna-Lena Tebbe, Wendel M Friedl, Georg W Alpers, Andreas Keil

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The European journal of neuroscience, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Anna-Lena TebbeMax Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4933-2797
Wendel M FriedlCenter for the Study of Emotion & Attention, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0220-4069
Georg W AlpersDepartment of Psychology, School of Social Sciences, University of Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9896-5158
Andreas KeilCenter for the Study of Emotion & Attention, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4064-1924
University of Florida · USUniversity of Mannheim · DE

Funding

MyAPS: Development and Validation of an AI Platform for Generating Emotional PicturesR01MH112558 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI MINGZHOU DING, Ruogu Fang · 2017 to 2026
$2.5M
Acquisition and extinction of affective bias in perception: A single trial approaR01MH097320 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI DING, MINGZHOU, KEIL, ANDREAS · 2012 to 2016
$1.7M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH097320NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH112558
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Visual scene processing is modulated by semantic, motivational, and emotional factors, in addition to physical scene statistics. An open question is to what extent those factors affect low-level visual processing. One index of low-level visual processing is the contrast response function (CRF), representing the change in neural or psychophysical gain with increasing stimulus contrast. Here we aimed to (a) establish the use of an electrophysiological technique for assessing CRFs with complex emotional scenes and (b) examine the effects of motivational context and emotional content on CRFs elicited by naturalistic stimuli, including faces and complex scenes (humans, animals). Motivational context varied by expectancy of threat (a noxious noise) versus safety. CRFs were measured in 18 participants by means of sweep steady-state visual evoked potentials. Results showed a facilitation in visuocortical sensitivity (contrast gain) under threat, compared with safe conditions, across all stimulus categories. Facial stimuli prompted heightened neural response gain, compared with scenes. Within the scenes, response gain was smaller for scenes high in emotional arousal, compared with low-arousing scenes, consistent with interference effects of emotional content. These findings support the notion that motivational context alters the contrast sensitivity of cortical tissue, differing from changes in response gain (activation) when visual cues themselves carry motivational/affective relevance.

Indexed as

ElectroencephalographyEvoked Potentials, VisualEmotionsHumansPhotic StimulationVisual Perceptioncontrastfacial stimulinaturalistic scenessteady-state visually evoked potentials

Identifiers

PMID33742482
PMCPMC10249592
OpenAlexW3136123095

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.