Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33742360›Full record

ReviewJournal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract2021

Prognostic and Therapeutic Implications of Tumor Biology, Including Gene Alterations, in Colorectal Liver Metastases.

Yujiro Nishioka, Yoshikuni Kawaguchi, Anai N Kothari, Bruno C Odisio, Jean Nicolas Vauthey

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Incidence of and Risk Factors for Incisional Hernia After Hepatectomy for Colorectal Liver Metastases.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yujiro NishiokaDepartment of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Unit 1484, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Houston, TX, USA.
Yoshikuni KawaguchiDepartment of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Unit 1484, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Houston, TX, USA.
Anai N KothariDepartment of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Unit 1484, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Houston, TX, USA.
Bruno C OdisioDepartment of Interventional Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Jean Nicolas VautheyDepartment of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Unit 1484, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Houston, TX, USA. jvauthey@mdanderson.org.ORCID 0000-0003-4921-5427
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFor patients with colorectal liver metastases (CLM), the combination of surgical resection with other therapeutic options is essential. This article shows how recent advances in knowledge of tumor biology, including genetic alterations, affect the choice of therapeutic approach for patients with CLM.

methodsWe reviewed the literature on recent advances in knowledge about CLM tumor biology including genetic profiles, clinical risk score models for CLM, preoperative therapy for CLM, and liver-directed therapy for CLM.

resultsStudies showed that RAS alteration is a negative prognostic factor in addition to traditional clinical risk factors (e.g., larger diameter and higher number of CLM, spread of the primary tumor to regional lymph nodes). Although the response to preoperative chemotherapy is an important predictor of survival, poor response is not a contraindication to surgical resection. The combination of surgical therapy and percutaneous ablation can be considered in marginally resectable cases; however, a wider ablation margin is required for RAS-mutant CLM. More recently, genetic analysis using next-generation sequencing showed the negative prognostic impact of alterations in TP53, SMAD4, FBXW7, and RAS/BRAF in patients with CLM. In RAS-mutant CLM, intensive follow-up is required in patients who remain recurrence free 2 years after surgery. DISCUSSION: In patients with CLM, RAS mutation status is important in predicting postoperative survival, selecting the treatment approach, and tailoring postoperative follow-up. In addition, more recent genetic analyses of CLM have identified additional predictors of survival.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsLiver NeoplasmsBiologyHepatectomyHumansNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPrognosisColorectal liver metastasesPercutaneous ablationSomatic gene mutations

Identifiers

PMID33742360
OpenAlexW3136855114

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.