Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33742355›Full record

ArticleAnimal cognition2021

A kestrel without hooked beak and talons is not a kestrel for the red-backed shrike (Lanius collurio).

Michal Němec, Tereza Kučerová, Petr Veselý, Roman Fuchs

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Animal cognition, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Red-backed shrike (Ecology and evolution · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Michal NěmecFaculty of Science, Jan Evangelista Purkyně University in Ústí nad Labem, Pasteurova 3544/1, 40096, Ústí nad Labem, Czech Republic.
Tereza KučerováFaculty of Sciences, Charles University, Albertov 6, Praha 2, 12800, Prague, Czech Republic.
Petr VeselýFaculty of Science, University of South Bohemia in České Budějovice, Branišovská 1760, 37005, České Budějovice, Czech Republic. petr-vesely@seznam.cz.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9935-2150
Roman FuchsFaculty of Science, University of South Bohemia in České Budějovice, Branišovská 1760, 37005, České Budějovice, Czech Republic.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2424-4424
Charles University · CZJan Evangelista Purkyně University in Ústí nad Labem · CZSewanee: The University of the South · US

Funding

Akademie Věd České Republiky IAA601410803Jihočeská Univerzita v Českých Budějovicích 048/2019/P
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Birds are strongly motivated to recognize various predators to secure survival and reproductive success. Thus, predator recognition provides a useful tool for the investigation of the process of discrimination and categorization in non-trained animals. The most important role in this process is usually attributed to the prominent unique features shared by all members within the wider category of predators (sharp teeth or beaks, claws, talons and conspicuous eyes). However, birds are also able to discriminate between particular predator species according to their species-specific features (based mainly on colouration). We manipulated general raptor salient features (hooked beak, talons with claws and eyes with supraorbital ridges) and/or species-specific plumage colouration on the dummy of a Eurasian kestrel (Falco tinnunculus) to investigate their importance in the recognition process of the red-backed shrikes (Lanius collurio) during nest defence. We showed that the presence of general raptor salient features is necessary for the recognition of a predator. The kestrel dummy with natural species-specific colouration with altered raptor salient features was treated by shrikes as a harmless bird. Nevertheless, pronounced changes in colouration also prevented successful recognition of the dummy as a kestrel, even when raptor salient features of a raptor were present.

Indexed as

FalconiformesPasseriformesRaptorsAnimalsBeakRecognition, PsychologyCategorizationColourationDiscriminationNest defenceSalient features

Identifiers

PMID33742355
OpenAlexW3138409338

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.