ArticleJournal of digital imaging2021
HER2 Molecular Marker Scoring Using Transfer Learning and Decision Level Fusion.
Article in Journal of digital imaging, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Deep learning based automated HER2 score prediction using immunohistochemistry histopathological images: a dual-center study.Frontiers in physiology · 2026Article
- Fully automatic HER2 tissue segmentation for interpretable HER2 scoring.Journal of pathology informatics · 2025Article
- Article
- Deep learning based analysis of G3BP1 protein expression to predict the prognosis of nasopharyngeal carcinoma.PloS one · 2025Article
- Enhancing glioma immunohistochemical image classification through color deconvolution-aware prior guidance.PloS one · 2025Article
- Deep-Learning-Based Approach in Cancer-Region Assessment from HER2-SISH Breast Histopathology Whole Slide Images.Cancers · 2024Article
- The Performance and Clinical Applicability of HER2 Digital Image Analysis in Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review.Cancers · 2024Review
- Deep Transfer Learning-Based Approach for Glucose Transporter-1 (GLUT1) Expression Assessment.Journal of digital imaging · 2023Article
- Predicting the HER2 status in oesophageal cancer from tissue microarrays using convolutional neural networks.British journal of cancer · 2023Article
- Analysis on factors behind sentinel lymph node metastasis in breast cancer by color ultrasonography, molybdenum target, and pathological detection.World journal of surgical oncology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In prognostic evaluation of breast cancer, immunohistochemical (IHC) marker human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) is used for prognostic evaluation. Accurate assessment of HER2-stained tissue sample is essential in therapeutic decision making for the patients. In regular clinical settings, expert pathologists assess the HER2-stained tissue slide under microscope for manual scoring based on prior experience. Manual scoring is time consuming, tedious, and often prone to inter-observer variation among group of pathologists. With the recent advancement in the area of computer vision and deep learning, medical image analysis has got significant attention. A number of deep learning architectures have been proposed for classification of different image groups. These networks are also used for transfer learning to classify other image classes. In the presented study, a number of transfer learning architectures are used for HER2 scoring. Five pre-trained architectures viz. VGG16, VGG19, ResNet50, MobileNetV2, and NASNetMobile with decimating the fully connected layers to get 3-class classification have been used for the comparative assessment of the networks as well as further scoring of stained tissue sample image based on statistical voting using mode operator. HER2 Challenge dataset from Warwick University is used in this study. A total of 2130 image patches were extracted to generate the training dataset from 300 training images corresponding to 30 training cases. The output model is then tested on 800 new test image patches from 100 test images acquired from 10 test cases (different from training cases) to report the outcome results. The transfer learning models have shown significant accuracy with VGG19 showing the best accuracy for the test images. The accuracy is found to be 93%, which increases to 98% on the image-based scoring using statistical voting mechanism. The output shows a capable quantification pipeline in automated HER2 score generation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.