Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33742282›Full record

Trial reportArchives of women's mental health2021

Improving the mother-infant relationship following postnatal depression: a randomised controlled trial of a brief intervention (HUGS).

Charlene Holt, Carole Gentilleau, Alan W Gemmill, Jeannette Milgrom

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Archives of women's mental health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Brief Interventions for Families Seeking Support from Family Services: A Scoping Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Observational
  17. Healing Together: A Narrative Review on How Psychiatric Treatment for Parental Depression Impacts Children.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Charlene HoltParent-Infant Research Institute, Austin Health, 300 Waterdale Rd, Heidelberg Heights, VIC, 3081, Australia. Charlene.Holt@austin.org.au.ORCID 0000-0003-2477-6375
Carole GentilleauDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Toulouse University Hospital (CHU de Toulouse), Toulouse, France.
Alan W GemmillParent-Infant Research Institute, Austin Health, 300 Waterdale Rd, Heidelberg Heights, VIC, 3081, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7753-4110
Jeannette MilgromParent-Infant Research Institute, Austin Health, 300 Waterdale Rd, Heidelberg Heights, VIC, 3081, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-4082-4595
Austin Health · AUThe University of Melbourne · AUUniversité Fédérale de Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées · FR

Funding

beyondblue 6524:SH (MILG11NPD)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Postnatal depression (PND) disrupts the crucial mother-infant relationship on which optimal child development depends. However, few well-evaluated, brief mother-infant interaction interventions exist. This randomised controlled trial (RCT) aimed to evaluate the effect of a 4-session, group-based mother-infant interaction intervention ('HUGS'), compared to a control playgroup, both following cognitive-behavioural therapy for PND, on mother-infant relationships and early child development. It was hypothesised that dyads receiving the HUGS intervention would show larger improvements than control dyads. Mothers (n = 77; M age = 32 years) diagnosed with major or minor depressive disorder using the Structured Clinical Interview for the DSM-IV participated with their infants (<12 months). Primary outcomes were observed mother-infant interactions using the Parent Child Early Relational Assessment (ERA) and maternal parenting stress using the Parenting Stress Index (PSI). Data were collected at baseline, post-PND treatment, post-HUGS intervention and 6-month post-HUGS follow-up. Seventy-four percent of HUGS dyads attended at least half of the HUGS sessions (≥2). Significant group differences emerged at the 6-month follow-up (but were not significant immediately post-HUGS). At 6-month follow-up, HUGS dyads showed significantly improved parental positive affective involvement and verbalisation (ERA; F

Indexed as

Depression, PostpartumMothersAdultAustraliaChildCrisis InterventionFemaleHumansInfantMother-Child RelationsParentingChild developmentInterventionMother-infant interactionsPostnatal depressionrandomised controlled trial

Identifiers

PMID33742282
OpenAlexW3137634738

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.