Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33742279›Full record

ArticleActa neurochirurgica2021

Survival of glioblastoma in relation to tumor location: a statistical tumor atlas of a population-based cohort.

Even Hovig Fyllingen, Lars Eirik Bø, Ingerid Reinertsen, Asgeir Store Jakola, Lisa Millgård Sagberg, Erik Magnus Berntsen, Øyvind Salvesen, Ole Solheim

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta neurochirurgica, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 70 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Even Hovig FyllingenDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Prinsesse Kristinas Gate 1, 7006, Trondheim, Norway. even.hovig.fyllingen@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-0495-1914
Lars Eirik BøDepartment of Health Research, SINTEF Digital, Trondheim, Norway.
Ingerid ReinertsenDepartment of Health Research, SINTEF Digital, Trondheim, Norway.
Asgeir Store JakolaDepartment of Neuromedicine and Movement Science, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway.
Lisa Millgård SagbergDepartment of Neurosurgery, St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway.
Erik Magnus BerntsenDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Prinsesse Kristinas Gate 1, 7006, Trondheim, Norway.
Øyvind SalvesenDepartment of Public Health and Nursing, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway.
Ole SolheimDepartment of Neuromedicine and Movement Science, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway.
Norwegian University of Science and Technology · NOSINTEF · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePrevious studies on the effect of tumor location on overall survival in glioblastoma have found conflicting results. Based on statistical maps, we sought to explore the effect of tumor location on overall survival in a population-based cohort of patients with glioblastoma and IDH wild-type astrocytoma WHO grade II-III with radiological necrosis.

methodsPatients were divided into three groups based on overall survival: < 6 months, 6-24 months, and > 24 months. Statistical maps exploring differences in tumor location between these three groups were calculated from pre-treatment magnetic resonance imaging scans. Based on the results, multivariable Cox regression analyses were performed to explore the possible independent effect of centrally located tumors compared to known prognostic factors by use of distance from center of the third ventricle to contrast-enhancing tumor border in centimeters as a continuous variable.

resultsA total of 215 patients were included in the statistical maps. Central tumor location (corpus callosum, basal ganglia) was associated with overall survival < 6 months. There was also a reduced overall survival in patients with tumors in the left temporal lobe pole. Tumors in the dorsomedial right temporal lobe and the white matter region involving the left anterior paracentral gyrus/dorsal supplementary motor area/medial precentral gyrus were associated with overall survival > 24 months. Increased distance from center of the third ventricle to contrast-enhancing tumor border was a positive prognostic factor for survival in elderly patients, but less so in younger patients.

conclusionsCentral tumor location was associated with worse prognosis. Distance from center of the third ventricle to contrast-enhancing tumor border may be a pragmatic prognostic factor in elderly patients.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsGlioblastomaAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisYoung AdultGeneral populationGlioblastomaMRINeurosurgerySurvivalTumor atlas

Identifiers

PMID33742279
PMCPMC8195961
OpenAlexW3136041579

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.