ArticleLangenbecks Archiv fur Chirurgie1988
[Results of surgical therapy of rectal cancer at a regional hospital].
Article in Langenbecks Archiv fur Chirurgie, 1988. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The results of surgical treatment of 198 unselected consecutive cases of adenocarcinoma of the rectum at a district hospital between January 1, 1977 and June 30, 1985 are analysed. Characteristics of patients at a primary referral center include old age (47.2% greater than or equal to 70 years) and advanced tumor stage (44.4% Dukes C and D). Despite these unfavourable cohort characteristics tumor excision rate was 97.5%, the proportion of sphincter saving resections 72.0%, using exclusively a single layer hand-sutured technique. Operative mortality was 3.6 and 5.5% for sphincter saving resection and abdomino-perineal excision respectively. The uncorrected cumulative probability of survival at five years is 56.1% for women, 35.0% for men, with a definite advantage for sphincter saving resection in both sexes. Uncorrected cumulative probability of survival according to tumor stage was 72.4% for Dukes stages A and B combined, 30.0% for Dukes C and 0 for D. Where oncologically radical rectal and mesorectal excision is possible from the sole abdominal access, there, hand-sutured abdominal anastomosis is also feasible and advantageous due to resorbable suture material. Taking into account the adversities of unselected patient cohorts, progress is still being achieved in rectal carcinoma surgery without "specialisation" but with improving general surgical and anaesthesiologic techniques.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.