ArticleEuropean journal of clinical nutrition2021
Total energy expenditure among children with motor, intellectual, visual, and hearing disabilities: a doubly labeled water method.
Article in European journal of clinical nutrition, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Effects of a 24-week exercise program on anthropometric, body composition, metabolic status, cardiovascular response, and neuromuscular capacity, in individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities.Frontiers in physiology · 2023Article
- Parents' Perspectives on Adaptive Sports in Children with Profound Intellectual and Multiple Disabilities.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Eating and Swallowing Issues in Students Enrolled in Special Education Schools for Intellectual Disabilities.Special care in dentistry : official publication of the American Association of Hospital Dentists, the Academy of Dentistry for the Handicapped, and the American Society for Geriatric DentistryArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveFew studies have evaluated the total energy expenditure (TEE) of children with disabilities using the doubly labeled water (DLW) method; however, none have compared it by disability type. Furthermore, no large-scale studies have focused on the severity of motor disability (MD). We aimed to compare TEE in children with disabilities by disability type.
methodsIn a cross-sectional study design, TEE was measured using the DLW method, anthropometry, and weighted food records. The following comparisons were made: (1) TEEs among four disability types and (2) TEEs of three subgroups classified by MD based on the Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS).
resultsIn total, 256 children (138 boys; ages 6-15 years) were studied. The comparison between the four disability types for boys in all age categories revealed that TEE (kJ/d) was lowest in MD, followed by intellectual disability (ID), visual disability, and hearing disability (HD), in that order. TEE/fat-free mass (FFM) (kJ/FFMkg/d) was also lowest in MD and highest in HD. TEE (kJ/d) and TEE/FFM (kJ/FFMkg/d) were also lowest in MD and highest in HD in girls. For both boys and girls, TEE (kJ/d) and TEE/FFM (kJ/FFMkg/d) were higher in the MD subtype GMFCS I-II than in GMFCS III-IV and GMFCS V.
conclusionsTEE differed, depending on the disability type, and was the lowest in MD and highest in HD for both boys and girls. Analysis by GMFCS classification revealed that greater severity of motor dysfunction resulted in lower TEE.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.