ReviewBone marrow transplantation2021
Use of checkpoint inhibitors in patients with lymphoid malignancies receiving allogeneic cell transplantation: a review.
Review in Bone marrow transplantation, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Transforming Intracerebral Hemorrhage Care with Artificial Intelligence: Opportunities, Challenges, and Future Directions.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Impact of Novel Agents on Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation in Patients with T-Cell Lymphomas.Cells · 2025Review
- GVHD in the era of checkpoint inhibition in Hodgkin lymphoma.Blood advances · 2025Article
- Improved overall survival with checkpoint inhibition and allogeneic transplantation in relapsed Hodgkin lymphoma.Blood advances · 2025Article
- Posttransplant cyclophosphamide beyond haploidentical transplantation.Annals of hematology · 2024Review
- The influence of immune checkpoint blockade on the outcomes of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.Frontiers in immunology · 2024Review
- Case Report: Severe cutaneous adverse event associated with checkpoint inhibition in the setting of CAR T-cell therapy: beyond CRS.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Article
- Review
- Immune checkpoint inhibitors and allogeneic transplant in lymphoid malignancies: a deceptive friend story.Bone marrow transplantation · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Monoclonal antibodies against checkpoint receptors or its ligands have demonstrated high response rates and durable remissions in patients with relapsed Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) and other lymphoid malignancies. However, most patients will eventually progress on therapy and may benefit from further treatments including allogenic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT). Furthermore, the use of checkpoint inhibitors (CPI) has emerged as a treatment option for patients relapsing after allo-HCT. The immune effects of the checkpoint blockade leading to a T-cell activation have raised some concerns on the safety of these therapies used either before or after allo-HCT, due to the potential risk of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). Furthermore, CPI might also induce other immune toxicities, that can affect almost any organ, as a result of the dysregulation on the immune system balance. This review aims to focus on the evidence behind the use of CPI in patients with lymphoma who undergo allo-HCT. We summarize the clinical data generated to date about the use of CPI in HL and other lymphoid malignancies, the mechanisms of checkpoint inhibition in the context of allo-HCT as well as the clinical and biological observations of different GVHD prophylaxis in this setting. Furthermore, we discuss the evidence from retrospective series and early clinical trials on the feasibility and safety of the use of CPI in patients who relapsed after allo-HCT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.