Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33742105›Full record

ArticleCommunications biology2021

smiFISH and embryo segmentation for single-cell multi-gene RNA quantification in arthropods.

Llilians Calvo, Matthew Ronshaugen, Tom Pettini

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Communications biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. EB-SUN, a new microtubule plus-end tracking protein inMolecular biology of the cell · 2024
    Article
  10. EB-SUN, a New Microtubule Plus-End Tracking Protein inbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. The dynamic duo of microtubule polymerase Mini spindles/XMAP215 and cytoplasmic dynein is essential for maintainingProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Llilians Calvo *Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PT, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8503-3535
Matthew RonshaugenFaculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PT, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5326-5924
Tom Pettini *Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PT, UK. pettini.tom@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-0199-1630
University of Manchester · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/P002153/1Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 203990/Z/16/A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recently, advances in fluorescent in-situ hybridization techniques and in imaging technology have enabled visualization and counting of individual RNA molecules in single cells. This has greatly enhanced the resolution in our understanding of transcriptional processes. Here, we adapt a recently published smiFISH protocol (single-molecule inexpensive fluorescent in-situ hybridization) to whole embryos across a range of arthropod model species, and also to non-embryonic tissues. Using multiple fluorophores with distinct spectra and white light laser confocal imaging, we simultaneously detect and separate single RNAs from up to eight different genes in a whole embryo. We also combine smiFISH with cell membrane immunofluorescence, and present an imaging and analysis pipeline for 3D cell segmentation and single-cell RNA counting in whole blastoderm embryos. Finally, using whole embryo single-cell RNA count data, we propose two alternative single-cell variability measures to the commonly used Fano factor, and compare the capacity of these three measures to address different aspects of single-cell expression variability.

Indexed as

In Situ Hybridization, FluorescenceMicroscopy, ConfocalSingle-Cell AnalysisAnimalsArthropodsColeopteraCrustaceaDrosophila melanogasterEmbryo, NonmammalianFluorescent Antibody TechniqueGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalImage Processing, Computer-AssistedRNATranscription, GeneticWaspsRNA

Identifiers

PMID33742105
PMCPMC7979837
OpenAlexW3124903521

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.