Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33742064›Full record

Trial reportScientific reports2021

High-intensity leg cycling alters the molecular response to resistance exercise in the arm muscles.

Marcus Moberg, William Apró, Igor Cervenka, Björn Ekblom, Gerrit van Hall, Hans-Christer Holmberg, Jorge L Ruas, Eva Blomstrand

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Marcus MobergDepartment of Physiology, Nutrition and Biomechanics, Swedish School of Sport and Health Sciences, Stockholm, Sweden. marcus.moberg@gih.se.
William ApróDepartment of Physiology, Nutrition and Biomechanics, Swedish School of Sport and Health Sciences, Stockholm, Sweden.
Igor CervenkaDepartment of Physiology and Pharmacology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Björn EkblomDepartment of Physiology, Nutrition and Biomechanics, Swedish School of Sport and Health Sciences, Stockholm, Sweden.
Gerrit van HallDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Hans-Christer HolmbergDepartment of Physiology and Pharmacology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Jorge L RuasDepartment of Physiology and Pharmacology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Eva BlomstrandDepartment of Physiology, Nutrition and Biomechanics, Swedish School of Sport and Health Sciences, Stockholm, Sweden.
Karolinska Institutet · SESwedish School of Sport and Health Sciences · SEUniversity of Copenhagen · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study examined acute molecular responses to concurrent exercise involving different muscles. Eight men participated in a randomized crossover-trial with two sessions, one where they performed interval cycling followed by upper body resistance exercise (ER-Arm), and one with upper body resistance exercise only (R-Arm). Biopsies were taken from the triceps prior to and immediately, 90- and 180-min following exercise. Immediately after resistance exercise, the elevation in S6K1 activity was smaller and the 4E-BP1:eIF4E interaction greater in ER-Arm, but this acute attenuation disappeared during recovery. The protein synthetic rate in triceps was greater following exercise than at rest, with no difference between trials. The level of PGC-1α1 mRNA increased to greater extent in ER-Arm than R-Arm after 90 min of recovery, as was PGC-1α4 mRNA after both 90 and 180 min. Levels of MuRF-1 mRNA was unchanged in R-Arm, but elevated during recovery in ER-Arm, whereas MAFbx mRNA levels increased slightly in both trials. RNA sequencing in a subgroup of subjects revealed 862 differently expressed genes with ER-Arm versus R-Arm during recovery. These findings suggest that leg cycling prior to arm resistance exercise causes systemic changes that potentiate induction of specific genes in the triceps, without compromising the anabolic response.

Indexed as

Adaptor Proteins, Signal TransducingAdultArmCell Cycle ProteinsEukaryotic Initiation Factor-4EHigh-Intensity Interval TrainingHumansLegMaleMuscle ProteinsMuscle, SkeletalPeroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor Gamma Coactivator 1-alphaResistance TrainingRibosomal Protein S6 Kinases, 70-kDaSKP Cullin F-Box Protein LigasesTripartite Motif ProteinsAdaptor Proteins, Signal TransducingCell Cycle ProteinsEIF4EBP1 protein, humanEukaryotic Initiation Factor-4EFBXO32 protein, humanMuscle ProteinsPeroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor Gamma Coactivator 1-alpharibosomal protein S6 kinase, 70kD, polypeptide 1Ribosomal Protein S6 Kinases, 70-kDaSKP Cullin F-Box Protein LigasesTRIM63 protein, humanTripartite Motif ProteinsUbiquitin-Protein Ligases

Identifiers

PMID33742064
PMCPMC7979871
OpenAlexW3137376480

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.