ArticleScientific reports2021
Compatibility between an overnight fasting and random cholesterol tests in Asians.
Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effects of fasting on HDL particle function and size distribution.Journal of lipid research · 2025Review
- Comparison of fasting and random lipid profiles among subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus: an outpatient-based cross-sectional study in Bangladesh.Diabetology & metabolic syndrome · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recent Western guidelines recommend non-fasting lipid profiles to manage dyslipidaemia. We explored its applicability to an Asian population. We determined the differences between an overnight fasting and non-fasting cholesterol profiles of patients with type-2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in Singapore. We studied 470 multi-ethnic Asian adult patients with T2DM and dyslipidaemia from 2 primary care clinics in Singapore. Non-fasting blood specimens were collected within 6 h after their last meal and within 14 days of a fasting specimen. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to compare the intraindividual lipid profiles. An ICC value > 0.75 implies good correlation. The mean age and T2DM duration of the study population were 62.5 years and 9.8 years respectively. Their mean non-fasting period was 2.46 h. The mean differences between non-fasting and fasting total cholesterol (TC), high-density lipoprotein (HDL-C), triglyceride (TG), low-density lipoprotein (LDL-C), and non HDL-C were + 0.04 mmol/l, - 0.001 mmol/l, + 0.48 mmol/l, - 0.15 mmol/l, and - 0.05 mmol/l respectively. The ICC (95% CI) for TC, HDL-C, TG, LDL-C and non-HDL-C were 0.820 (0.788-0.847), 0.873 (0.850-0.893), 0.579 (0.516-0.636), 0.764 (0.723-0.799), and 0.825 (0.794-0.852) respectively. The fasting and non-fasting lipid profiles were similar in our local Asian patients with T2DM taking statin. Their non-fasting lipid profile can be used to assess their cholesterol treatment status.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.