Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33741950›Full record

ArticleNature communications2021

Deep generative neural network for accurate drug response imputation.

Peilin Jia, Ruifeng Hu, Guangsheng Pei, Yulin Dai, Yin-Ying Wang, Zhongming Zhao

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed, 87 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Identification of Clinically Relevant Genes Using Machine Learning Techniques.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Functional, Pharmacogenomic, and Immune Landscapes of Long Non-Coding RNAs in Cancer.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Drug Sensitivity Prediction Based on Multi-stage Multi-modal Drug Representation Learning.Interdisciplinary sciences, computational life sciences · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Drug Repurposing.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Peilin JiaCenter for Precision Health, School of Biomedical Informatics, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA. peilin.jia@uth.tmc.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-4523-4153
Ruifeng HuCenter for Precision Health, School of Biomedical Informatics, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5549-3082
Guangsheng PeiCenter for Precision Health, School of Biomedical Informatics, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1804-7598
Yulin DaiCenter for Precision Health, School of Biomedical Informatics, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1874-7893
Yin-Ying WangCenter for Precision Health, School of Biomedical Informatics, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA.
Zhongming ZhaoCenter for Precision Health, School of Biomedical Informatics, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA. zhongming.zhao@uth.tmc.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-3477-0914
The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston · USThe University of Texas Health Science Center · USThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · US

Funding

Transforming dbGaP genetic and genomic data to FAIR-ready by artificial intelligence and machine learning algorithmsR01LM012806 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI Zhongming Zhao · 2017 to 2026
$3.7M
NLM NIH HHS R01 LM012806
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Drug response differs substantially in cancer patients due to inter- and intra-tumor heterogeneity. Particularly, transcriptome context, especially tumor microenvironment, has been shown playing a significant role in shaping the actual treatment outcome. In this study, we develop a deep variational autoencoder (VAE) model to compress thousands of genes into latent vectors in a low-dimensional space. We then demonstrate that these encoded vectors could accurately impute drug response, outperform standard signature-gene based approaches, and appropriately control the overfitting problem. We apply rigorous quality assessment and validation, including assessing the impact of cell line lineage, cross-validation, cross-panel evaluation, and application in independent clinical data sets, to warrant the accuracy of the imputed drug response in both cell lines and cancer samples. Specifically, the expression-regulated component (EReX) of the observed drug response achieves high correlation across panels. Using the well-trained models, we impute drug response of The Cancer Genome Atlas data and investigate the features and signatures associated with the imputed drug response, including cell line origins, somatic mutations and tumor mutation burdens, tumor microenvironment, and confounding factors. In summary, our deep learning method and the results are useful for the study of signatures and markers of drug response.

Indexed as

Deep LearningNeural Networks, ComputerPharmaceutical PreparationsAntineoplastic AgentsCell Line, TumorGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansNeoplasmsTranscriptomeTumor MicroenvironmentAntineoplastic AgentsPharmaceutical Preparations

Identifiers

PMID33741950
PMCPMC7979803
OpenAlexW3137482466

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.