Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33741632›Full record

ReviewApplied and environmental microbiology2021

Determining Gut Microbial Dysbiosis: a Review of Applied Indexes for Assessment of Intestinal Microbiota Imbalances.

Shaodong Wei, Martin Iain Bahl, Simon Mark Dahl Baunwall, Christian Lodberg Hvas, Tine Rask Licht

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Applied and environmental microbiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 101 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
101citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
7.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

101 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 155 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. The association between the gut microbiome and fatigue in individuals living with cancer: a systematic review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Review
  8. Gut microbiota in health and disease.Molecular biomedicine · 2026
    Review
  9. Article
  10. FermentedFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Treatment of Dietary DefattedAquaculture nutrition · 2026
    Article
  20. Review

41 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Shaodong WeiNational Food Institute, Technical University of Denmark, Kgs Lyngby, Denmark.
Martin Iain BahlNational Food Institute, Technical University of Denmark, Kgs Lyngby, Denmark.
Simon Mark Dahl BaunwallDepartment of Hepatology and Gastroenterology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Christian Lodberg HvasDepartment of Hepatology and Gastroenterology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Tine Rask LichtNational Food Institute, Technical University of Denmark, Kgs Lyngby, Denmark trli@food.dtu.dk.ORCID 0000-0002-6399-9574
Technical University of Denmark · DKAarhus University Hospital · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Assessing "dysbiosis" in intestinal microbial communities is increasingly considered a routine analysis in microbiota studies, and it has added relevant information to the prediction and characterization of diseases and other adverse conditions. However, dysbiosis is not a well-defined condition. A variety of different dysbiosis indexes have been suggested and applied, but their underlying methodologies, as well as the cohorts and conditions for which they have been developed, differ considerably. To date, no comprehensive overview and comparison of all the different methodologies and applications of such indexes is available. Here, we list all types of dysbiosis indexes identified in the literature, introduce their methodology, group them into categories, and discuss their potential descriptive and clinical applications as well as their limitations. Thus, our focus is not on the implications of dysbiosis for disease but on the methodological approaches available to determine and quantify this condition.

Indexed as

Diagnostic Tests, RoutineDysbiosisGastrointestinal MicrobiomeHumansdysbiosisdysbiosis indexgutimbalanceintestinemicrobiomemicrobiota

Identifiers

PMID33741632
PMCPMC8208139
OpenAlexW3138229755

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.