ArticleFEBS open bio2021
Potent ABA-independent activation of engineered PYL3.
Article in FEBS open bio, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- An Engineered Abscisic Acid Receptor Enhances ABA Signaling and Improves Abiotic Stress Tolerance in Rice.Plant, cell & environment · 2026Article
- Characterization of the ABA receptor PYL gene family and identification of DoPYL1-interacting proteins in Dendrobium officinale.BMC plant biology · 2025Article
- Molecular profiling ofFrontiers in plant science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Abscisic acid (ABA) plays a vital role in many developmental processes and the response to adaptive stress in plants. Under drought stress, plants enhance levels of ABA and activate ABA receptors, but under harsh environmental stress, plants usually cannot efficiently synthesize and release sufficient quantities of ABA. The response of plants to harsh environmental stress may be improved through ABA-independent activation of ABA receptors. The molecular basis of ABA-independent inhibition of group A protein phosphatases type 2C (PP2Cs) by pyrabactin resistance/Pyr1-like (PYR1/PYLs) is not yet clear. Here, we used our previously reported structures of PYL3 to first obtain the monomeric PYL3 mutant and then to introduce bulky hydrophobic residue substitutions to promote the closure of the Gate/L6/CL2 loop, thereby mimicking the conformation of ABA occupancy. Through structure-guided mutagenesis and biochemical characterization, we investigated the mechanism of ABA-independent activation of PYL3. Two types of PYL3 mutants were obtained: (a) PYL3 V108K V107L V192F can bind to ABA and effectively inhibit HAB1 without ABA; (b) PYL3 V108K V107F V192F, PYL3 V108K V107L V192F L111F and PYL3 V108K V107F V192F L111F cannot recognize ABA but can greatly inhibit HAB1 without ABA. Intriguingly, the ability of PYL3 mutants to bind to ABA was severely compromised if any two of three variable residues (V107, V192 and L111) were mutated into a bulky hydrophobic residue. The introduction of PYL3 mutants into transgenic plants will help elucidate the functionality of PYL3 in vivo and may facilitate the future production of transgenic crops with high yield and tolerance of abiotic stresses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.