Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33740131›Full record

ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2021

A survey of cancer patients, caregivers, and providers regarding familiarity, importance, and utilization of supportive and integrative oncology services.

Cherry Jiang, Olivia Larbi, Denise Feyes, Gi-Ming Wang, Hasina Momotaz, Ming Li, Katherine Daunov, Barbara Daly, Susan Mazanec, Samuel Rodgers-Melnick and 5 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Small steps, big impact: redefining cancer survival through lifestyle.Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Cherry JiangCase Western Reserve University School of Medicine Comprehensive Cancer Center, 2103 Cornell Rd, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA.
Olivia LarbiCase Western Reserve University School of Medicine Comprehensive Cancer Center, 2103 Cornell Rd, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA.
Denise FeyesCase Western Reserve University School of Medicine Comprehensive Cancer Center, 2103 Cornell Rd, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA.
Gi-Ming WangCase Western Reserve University School of Medicine Comprehensive Cancer Center, 2103 Cornell Rd, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA.
Hasina MomotazCase Western Reserve University School of Medicine Comprehensive Cancer Center, 2103 Cornell Rd, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA.
Ming LiCase Western Reserve University School of Medicine Comprehensive Cancer Center, 2103 Cornell Rd, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA.
Katherine DaunovUniversity Hospitals, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Barbara DalyCase Western Reserve University School of Medicine Comprehensive Cancer Center, 2103 Cornell Rd, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA.
Susan MazanecCase Western Reserve University School of Medicine Comprehensive Cancer Center, 2103 Cornell Rd, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA.
Samuel Rodgers-MelnickCase Western Reserve University School of Medicine Comprehensive Cancer Center, 2103 Cornell Rd, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA.
Sarah RolfeUniversity Hospitals, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Nancy TamburroCleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Monica Webb HooperCase Western Reserve University School of Medicine Comprehensive Cancer Center, 2103 Cornell Rd, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA.
Sean HobsonCase Western Reserve University School of Medicine Comprehensive Cancer Center, 2103 Cornell Rd, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA.
Richard T LeeCase Western Reserve University School of Medicine Comprehensive Cancer Center, 2103 Cornell Rd, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA. Richard.T.Lee@Case.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9916-6155

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeSupportive and integrative oncology services aim to improve the quality of life of cancer patients. This study characterizes the views of these services among cancer patients, caregivers, and providers at a comprehensive cancer center.

methodsA cross-sectional survey was administered in 2017-2018. The survey asked about participants' familiarity, perceived importance, use, accessibility, and barriers to 19 supportive and integrative oncology services using a Likert scale. Data were analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis test and a proportional odds regression model.

resultsA total of 976 surveys were obtained (604 patient surveys, 199 caregiver surveys, 173 provider surveys). Patients were mostly female (56.3%), ≥60 years old (59.4%), and Caucasian (66%). Providers were an even distribution of nurses, physicians, and advanced practice providers. Patients felt social work and nutrition services were the most familiar (36.4% and 34.8%) and the most important (46.3% and 54.5%). Caregivers were also most familiar with those two services, but felt that nutrition and learning resources were most important. Social work and nutrition were easiest to access and used the most by both patients and providers. There was a positive correlation between accessibility and perceived importance. Being unaware was the most common barrier identified by patients (38.4%), providers (67.1%), and caregivers (33.7%).

conclusionSocial work and nutrition services were most familiar to respondents, and also generally the most important, accessible, and utilized. Lack of awareness was the most common barrier cited and suggests that increased efforts to educate patients and providers about other services available are needed.

Indexed as

Integrative OncologyNeoplasmsCaregiversCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedQuality of LifeSurveys and QuestionnairesAccessibilityCaregiversIntegrativeOncologyPatientsProvidersSupportive

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.