Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33740069›Full record

ArticleDer Nervenarzt2022

[Outsourcing of nursing staff costs in psychiatry? : A secondary data analysis of possible effects on the remuneration system in psychiatry].

Julian Schwarz, Martin Heinze, Martin Holzke, Andreas Klär, Michael Löhr, Reinhard Schaffert, Jan Wolff

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Der Nervenarzt, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Julian SchwarzHochschulklinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie der Medizinischen Hochschule Brandenburg, Immanuel Klinik Rüdersdorf, Seebad 82/83, 15562, Rüdersdorf, Deutschland. julian.schwarz@mhb-fontane.de.
Martin HeinzeHochschulklinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie der Medizinischen Hochschule Brandenburg, Immanuel Klinik Rüdersdorf, Seebad 82/83, 15562, Rüdersdorf, Deutschland.
Martin HolzkeKlinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie Weissenau, ZfP Südwürttemberg, Weingartshofer Straße 2, 88214, Ravensburg, Deutschland.
Andreas KlärJüdisches Krankenhaus Berlin, Heinz-Galinski-Str. 1, 13347, Berlin, Deutschland.
Michael LöhrKlinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Geriatrie und Neurologie, LWL Klinikum, Buxelstraße 50, 33334, Gütersloh, Deutschland.
Reinhard SchaffertKlinikverbund Hessen e. V., Forsthausstr. 1-3, Haus 3e, 35578, Wetzlar, Deutschland.
Jan WolffPeter L. Reichertz Institut für Medizinische Informatik der TU Braunschweig und der Medizinischen Hochschule Hannover, Mühlenpfordtstraße 23, 38106, Braunschweig, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNursing staff were excluded from the German DRG system for somatic hospital treatment and will be funded separately in the future. In psychiatry and psychosomatic medicine, binding personnel requirements have been defined but there has been no regulation of how these personnel requirements are adequately financed.

objectiveThe objective of this study was to analyze the costs of inpatient psychiatry and psychosomatic medicine and to evaluate possible effects of funding nursing staff separately. MATERIAL AND

methodsThis analysis is based on aggregated daily treatment costs of selected hospitals (data year 2018), which annually submit their performance and cost data to the Institute for the Hospital Remuneration System (InEK) for the empirical further development of the remuneration system.

resultsNursing staff represent the largest cost factor in inpatient psychiatry and psychosomatic medicine. Excluding nursing staff drastically reduces the variance of psychiatric DRG renumeration and even exceeds its proportion of the total costs. After outsourcing nursing costs, psychiatric DRGs achieve only a very limited cost separation.

conclusionThe binding personnel requirements necessitate adequate financing of nursing staff. This raises the debate about the further development of psychiatric remuneration. The question arises as to whether the effort associated with using the psychiatric DRG system justifies its usefulness as an instrument for budgeting when core functions such as cost separation are only given to a limited extent. Alternative approaches to budgeting should also be examined for putting costs and benefits in a better ratio.

Indexed as

Nursing StaffOutsourced ServicesPsychiatryData AnalysisDiagnosis-Related GroupsGermanyHumansRemunerationAssessment of costsEpisodic paymentHospital reimbursementMental health nursingSecondary data analysis

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.