Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33740025›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Determinants of compliance to the facemask directive in Greece: A population study.

Georgios Labiris, Eirini-Kanella Panagiotopoulou, Asli Perente, Eleftherios Chatzimichael, Ioannis Fotiadis, Sergios Taliantzis, Aristeidis Konstantinidis, Doukas Dardabounis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Georgios LabirisDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Hospital of Alexandroupolis, Dragana, Alexandroupolis, Greece.ORCID 0000-0003-4364-1943
Eirini-Kanella PanagiotopoulouDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Hospital of Alexandroupolis, Dragana, Alexandroupolis, Greece.
Asli PerenteDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Hospital of Alexandroupolis, Dragana, Alexandroupolis, Greece.
Eleftherios ChatzimichaelDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Hospital of Alexandroupolis, Dragana, Alexandroupolis, Greece.
Ioannis FotiadisDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Hospital of Alexandroupolis, Dragana, Alexandroupolis, Greece.
Sergios TaliantzisDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Hospital of Alexandroupolis, Dragana, Alexandroupolis, Greece.
Aristeidis KonstantinidisDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Hospital of Alexandroupolis, Dragana, Alexandroupolis, Greece.ORCID 0000-0001-5419-956X
Doukas DardabounisDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Hospital of Alexandroupolis, Dragana, Alexandroupolis, Greece.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePrimary objective of this study was to identify potential difficulties and/or discomfort when using a facemask. Moreover, to explore the impact of spectacles, contact lenses and visual acuity on the compliance to the facemask directive.

methodsThis is a prospective study that was conducted at the Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital of Alexandroupolis, Greece between June 2020 and August 2020. Greek speaking citizens with permanent residency in Greece above 18 years old were included. A custom questionnaire (DeMask-20) was constructed and validated, which pertained to the perceived difficulty and discomfort when using a facemask. It contained 20 items grouped in 8 subscales (driving, near vision, distance vision, ocular discomfort, role limitation, collaboration, dependency on others, emotional stress). Perceived difficulty and discomfort when using a facemask, compliance and correlations of compliance with DeMask-20 scores, demographics, spectacle and/or contact lens use, and visual acuity were evaluated.

resultsThe number of factors was determined through factor analysis. Cronbach's alpha ranged from 0.716 for the "Role limitation" subscale to 0.938 for "Ocular discomfort" subscale. 1,214 participants (402 men, 812 women, mean age 36.79±12.50 years) completed the DeMask-20 instrument. Mean DeMask-20 score of all study participants was 3.79±0.71. Significant differences in DeMask-20 score were detected in gender (p = 0.009), spectacle use (p = 0.034), contact lens use (p = 0.049), and binocular distance visual acuity (bDVA) (p = 0.001). Mean compliance of all participants was 4.05±0.96. Men, people <50 years and spectacle wearers showed significantly worse compliance (p<0.05). Moreover, professional workers and professional drivers demonstrated significantly better compliance (p = 0.008 and p = 0.047). Significant correlation was detected between compliance and DeMask-20 score (p<0.001, R2 = 0.471). Significant correlations were detected with driving, near vision, distance vision, collaboration, role limitation, emotional stress (p<0.05, R2: 0.386-0.493).

conclusionsFactor analysis suggested that the DeMask-20 instrument demonstrates adequate validity, while Cronbach's alpha indicated sufficient internal consistency of all subscales. This study provided the necessary methods that could evaluate compliance trends and the efficacy of healthcare interventions against COVID-19. Our outcomes suggest that young males who use spectacles should be targeted by Greek Healthcare authorities in order to improve compliance rates.

Indexed as

Guideline AdherenceMasksAdultAge FactorsAutomobile DrivingContact LensesCOVID-19EyeglassesFemaleGreeceHumansMaleProspective StudiesSARS-CoV-2Social MediaSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID33740025
PMCPMC7978275

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.