Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33739801›Full record

SynthesisCanadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgie2021

Portal vein arterialization as a salvage procedure in hepatopancreatobiliary surgery: a systematic review.

Ali Majlesara, Omid Ghamarnejad, Elias Khajeh, Mohammad Golriz, Negin Gharabaghi, Katrin Hoffmann, De-Hua Chang, Markus W Büchler, Arianeb Mehrabi

Open access · diamondAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Canadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgie, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ali MajlesaraFrom the Department of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany (Majlesara, Ghamarnejad, Khajeh, Golriz, Gharabaghi, Hoffman, Büchler, Mehrabi); and the Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany (Chang).
Omid GhamarnejadFrom the Department of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany (Majlesara, Ghamarnejad, Khajeh, Golriz, Gharabaghi, Hoffman, Büchler, Mehrabi); and the Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany (Chang).
Elias KhajehFrom the Department of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany (Majlesara, Ghamarnejad, Khajeh, Golriz, Gharabaghi, Hoffman, Büchler, Mehrabi); and the Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany (Chang).
Mohammad GolrizFrom the Department of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany (Majlesara, Ghamarnejad, Khajeh, Golriz, Gharabaghi, Hoffman, Büchler, Mehrabi); and the Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany (Chang).
Negin GharabaghiFrom the Department of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany (Majlesara, Ghamarnejad, Khajeh, Golriz, Gharabaghi, Hoffman, Büchler, Mehrabi); and the Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany (Chang).
Katrin HoffmannFrom the Department of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany (Majlesara, Ghamarnejad, Khajeh, Golriz, Gharabaghi, Hoffman, Büchler, Mehrabi); and the Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany (Chang).
De-Hua ChangFrom the Department of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany (Majlesara, Ghamarnejad, Khajeh, Golriz, Gharabaghi, Hoffman, Büchler, Mehrabi); and the Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany (Chang).
Markus W BüchlerFrom the Department of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany (Majlesara, Ghamarnejad, Khajeh, Golriz, Gharabaghi, Hoffman, Büchler, Mehrabi); and the Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany (Chang).
Arianeb MehrabiFrom the Department of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany (Majlesara, Ghamarnejad, Khajeh, Golriz, Gharabaghi, Hoffman, Büchler, Mehrabi); and the Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany (Chang).
University Hospital Heidelberg · DEHeidelberg University · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Portal vein arterialization (PVA) is a possible option when hepatic artery reconstruction is impossible during liver resection. The aim of this study was to review the literature on the clinical application of PVA in hepatopancreatobiliary (HPB) surgery. Methods: We performed a systematic review according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. We systematically searched the PubMed, Embase and Web of Science databases until December 2019. Experimental (animal) studies, review articles and letters were excluded. Results: Twenty studies involving 57 patients were included. Cholangiocarcinoma was the most common indication for surgery (40 patients [74%]). An end-to-side anastomosis between a celiac trunk branch and the portal vein was the main PVA technique (35 patients [59%]). Portal hypertension was the most common longterm complication (12 patients [21%] after a mean of 4.1 mo). The median followup period was 12 (range 1-87) months. The 1-, 3- and 5-year survival rates were 64%, 27% and 20%, respectively. Conclusion: Portal vein arterialization can be considered as a rescue option to improve the outcome in patients with acute liver de-arterialization when arterial reconstruction is not possible. To prevent portal hypertension and liver injuries due to thrombosis or overarterialization, vessel calibre adjustment and timely closure of the anastomosis should be considered. Further prospective experimental and clinical studies are needed to investigate the potential of this procedure in patients whose liver is suddenly de-arterialized during HPB procedures.

Indexed as

Bile DuctsDigestive System Surgical ProceduresHumansLiverPancreasPortal Vein

Identifiers

PMID33739801
PMCPMC8064267
OpenAlexW3136211808

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.