Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33739486›Full record

ArticleAddiction (Abingdon, England)2021

Policy influence and the legalized cannabis industry: learnings from other addictive consumption industries.

Peter J Adams, Marta Rychert, Chris Wilkins

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Addiction (Abingdon, England), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. People who use drugs and the right to health.Harm reduction journal · 2024
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Cannabis industry campaign expenditures in Colorado, 2005-2021.The International journal on drug policy · 2023
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Think big about developing the science.Addiction (Abingdon, England) · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Peter J AdamsCentre for Addiction Research, School of Population Health, University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-3237-0108
Marta RychertSocial and Health Outcomes Research and Evaluation (SHORE), SHORE and Whaariki Research Centre, College of Health, Massey University, P.O. Box 6137, Wellesley Street, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0003-4170-1615
Chris WilkinsSocial and Health Outcomes Research and Evaluation (SHORE), SHORE and Whaariki Research Centre, College of Health, Massey University, P.O. Box 6137, Wellesley Street, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-5564-6226
Massey University · NZUniversity of Auckland · NZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimNew Zealand has recently legalized medicinal cannabis and has explored the possibility of legalizing large-scale recreational cannabis supply. In the process, concerns have emerged regarding whether corporations involved in the large-scale production and sale of legalized cannabis will invest in tactics of influence with policymakers and the public. This paper aimed to examine the various ways a legalized cannabis industry could seek to influence governments and the public in the New Zealand reform context.

methodBased on the study of industry tactics with alcohol, tobacco and gambling, we applied a three-chain model of industry influence that breaks tactics into the 'public good', 'knowledge' and 'political' chains.

resultsExploratory analysis of the nascent cannabis industry's activity in New Zealand provided signs of industry influence strategies related to all three chains. The medicinal cannabis industry has associated the establishment of a legal cannabis sector with regional economic development and employment, supported lobbying for recreational law reform, funded NGOs involved in lobbying for law reform, established research partnerships with universities, invited ex-politicians on advisory boards, and participated in government public sector partnerships.

conclusionThere is emerging evidence that the legal cannabis industry is using strategies to influence the regulatory environment in New Zealand.

Indexed as

CannabisGovernmentHumansLobbyingPolicyUniversitiesCannabiscommercial determinantsconflicts of interestdrug policyindustry influencelegalizationmarijuanaregulatory capture

Identifiers

PMID33739486
OpenAlexW3137658324

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.