Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33739416›Full record

ArticleMolecular biology and evolution2021

Rubisco Adaptation Is More Limited by Phylogenetic Constraint Than by Catalytic Trade-off.

Jacques W Bouvier, David M Emms, Timothy Rhodes, Jai S Bolton, Amelia Brasnett, Alice Eddershaw, Jochem R Nielsen, Anastasia Unitt, Spencer M Whitney, Steven Kelly

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular biology and evolution, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Rubisco is slow across the tree of life.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. A phylogenetic approach to comparative genomics.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2025
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Rubisco is evolving for improved catalytic efficiency and COProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Engineering Rubisco to enhance COSynthetic and systems biotechnology · 2024
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Jacques W BouvierDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
David M EmmsDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-9065-8978
Timothy RhodesResearch School of Biology, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, Australia.
Jai S BoltonDoctoral Training Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Amelia BrasnettDoctoral Training Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Alice EddershawDoctoral Training Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Jochem R NielsenDoctoral Training Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Anastasia UnittDoctoral Training Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Spencer M WhitneyResearch School of Biology, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, Australia.
Steven KellyDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-8583-5362

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/M011224/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/P003117/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rubisco assimilates CO2 to form the sugars that fuel life on earth. Correlations between rubisco kinetic traits across species have led to the proposition that rubisco adaptation is highly constrained by catalytic trade-offs. However, these analyses did not consider the phylogenetic context of the enzymes that were analyzed. Thus, it is possible that the correlations observed were an artefact of the presence of phylogenetic signal in rubisco kinetics and the phylogenetic relationship between the species that were sampled. Here, we conducted a phylogenetically resolved analysis of rubisco kinetics and show that there is a significant phylogenetic signal in rubisco kinetic traits. We re-evaluated the extent of catalytic trade-offs accounting for this phylogenetic signal and found that all were attenuated. Following phylogenetic correction, the largest catalytic trade-offs were observed between the Michaelis constant for CO2 and carboxylase turnover (∼21-37%), and between the Michaelis constants for CO2 and O2 (∼9-19%), respectively. All other catalytic trade-offs were substantially attenuated such that they were marginal (<9%) or non-significant. This phylogenetically resolved analysis of rubisco kinetic evolution also identified kinetic changes that occur concomitant with the evolution of C4 photosynthesis. Finally, we show that phylogenetic constraints have played a larger role than catalytic trade-offs in limiting the evolution of rubisco kinetics. Thus, although there is strong evidence for some catalytic trade-offs, rubisco adaptation has been more limited by phylogenetic constraint than by the combined action of all catalytic trade-offs.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularPhylogenyAdaptation, BiologicalKineticsPhotosynthesisRibulose-Bisphosphate CarboxylaseTriticumRibulose-Bisphosphate CarboxylaseC4 photosynthesiscatalytic constraintevolutionphylogenetic constraintrubisco

Identifiers

PMID33739416
PMCPMC8233502

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.