Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33739415›Full record

SynthesisJournal of experimental botany2021

A meta-analysis of mesophyll conductance to CO2 in relation to major abiotic stresses in poplar species.

Raed Elferjani, Lahcen Benomar, Mina Momayyezi, Roberto Tognetti, Ülo Niinemets, Raju Y Soolanayakanahally, Guillaume Théroux-Rancourt, Tiina Tosens, Francesco Ripullone, Simon Bilodeau-Gauthier and 3 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of experimental botany, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Simulated Analysis of Influence of Changes in HPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  4. Sunflower Leaf Structure Affects ChlorophyllInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 9 institutions in 5 countries.

Raed ElferjaniQuebec Network for Reforestation and Intensive Silviculture, TELUQ University, Montreal, QC, H2S 3L5, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-0577-3769
Lahcen BenomarForest Research Institute, University of Quebec in Abitibi-Temiscamingue, Rouyn-Noranda, QC, J9X 5E4, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-9301-5655
Mina MomayyeziDepartment of Viticulture and Enology, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
Roberto TognettiUniversità degli Studi del Molise, Via De Sanctis, 86100 Campobasso, Italy.
Ülo NiinemetsEstonian University of Life Sciences, Kreutzwaldi 1, 51006 Tartu, Estonia.
Raju Y SoolanayakanahallyIndian Head Research Farm, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Indian Head, SK, S0G 2K0, Canada.
Guillaume Théroux-RancourtInstitute of Botany, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Gregor-Mendel-Strasse 33, 1180 Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-2591-0524
Tiina TosensEstonian University of Life Sciences, Kreutzwaldi 1, 51006 Tartu, Estonia.
Francesco RipulloneUniversity of Basilicata, Via Ateneo Lucano 10, 85100 Potenza, Italy.
Simon Bilodeau-GauthierDirection de la Recherche Forestière, 2700 rue Einstein, Québec, QC, G1P 3W8, Canada.
Mohammed S LamhamediDirection de la Recherche Forestière, 2700 rue Einstein, Québec, QC, G1P 3W8, Canada.
Carlo CalfapietraInstitute of Agro-Environmental & Forest Biology (IBAF), National Research Council (CNR), Via Marconi 2, Porano (TR) 05010, Italy.
Mebarek LamaraForest Research Institute, University of Quebec in Abitibi-Temiscamingue, Rouyn-Noranda, QC, J9X 5E4, Canada.
Estonian University of Life Sciences · EEUniversité du Québec en Abitibi-Témiscamingue · CAAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada · CABOKU University · ATNational Research Council · ITUniversité TÉLUQ · CAUniversity of Basilicata · ITUniversity of California, Davis · USUniversity of Molise · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mesophyll conductance (gm) determines the diffusion of CO2 from the substomatal cavities to the site of carboxylation in the chloroplasts and represents a critical component of the diffusive limitation of photosynthesis. In this study, we evaluated the average effect sizes of different environmental constraints on gm in Populus spp., a forest tree model. We collected raw data of 815 A-Ci response curves from 26 datasets to estimate gm, using a single curve-fitting method to alleviate method-related bias. We performed a meta-analysis to assess the effects of different abiotic stresses on gm. We found a significant increase in gm from the bottom to the top of the canopy that was concomitant with the increase of maximum rate of carboxylation and light-saturated photosynthetic rate (Amax). gm was positively associated with increases in soil moisture and nutrient availability, but was insensitive to increasing soil copper concentration and did not vary with atmospheric CO2 concentration. Our results showed that gm was strongly related to Amax and to a lesser extent to stomatal conductance (gs). Moreover, a negative exponential relationship was obtained between gm and specific leaf area, which may be used to scale-up gm within the canopy.

Indexed as

PopulusCarbon DioxideMesophyll CellsPhotosynthesisPlant LeavesPlant StomataStress, PhysiologicalCarbon DioxideAbiotic stressA–C i curvemesophyll conductancemeta-analysisphotosynthesispoplar

Identifiers

PMID33739415
PMCPMC8163042
OpenAlexW3138636475

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.