Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33739390›Full record

ReviewGenome biology and evolution2021

The Genomic Architecture and Evolutionary Fates of Supergenes.

Juanita Gutiérrez-Valencia, P William Hughes, Emma L Berdan, Tanja Slotte

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Genome biology and evolution, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 62 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
62citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

62 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Balanced polymorphism in a floral transcription factor underlies the ancient rhythm of daily sex alternation in avocado.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Multiple Origins of a Sex Ratio Supergene in Formica Ants.Molecular biology and evolution · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Functional genetic elements of a butterfly mimicry supergene.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

2 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Juanita Gutiérrez-ValenciaDepartment of Ecology, Environment and Plant Sciences, Science for Life Laboratory, Stockholm University, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-9725-8523
P William HughesDepartment of Ecology, Environment and Plant Sciences, Science for Life Laboratory, Stockholm University, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-4142-2579
Emma L BerdanDepartment of Ecology, Environment and Plant Sciences, Science for Life Laboratory, Stockholm University, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-6435-4604
Tanja SlotteDepartment of Ecology, Environment and Plant Sciences, Science for Life Laboratory, Stockholm University, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-6020-5102
Stockholm University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Supergenes are genomic regions containing sets of tightly linked loci that control multi-trait phenotypic polymorphisms under balancing selection. Recent advances in genomics have uncovered significant variation in both the genomic architecture as well as the mode of origin of supergenes across diverse organismal systems. Although the role of genomic architecture for the origin of supergenes has been much discussed, differences in the genomic architecture also subsequently affect the evolutionary trajectory of supergenes and the rate of degeneration of supergene haplotypes. In this review, we synthesize recent genomic work and historical models of supergene evolution, highlighting how the genomic architecture of supergenes affects their evolutionary fate. We discuss how recent findings on classic supergenes involved in governing ant colony social form, mimicry in butterflies, and heterostyly in flowering plants relate to theoretical expectations. Furthermore, we use forward simulations to demonstrate that differences in genomic architecture affect the degeneration of supergenes. Finally, we discuss implications of the evolution of supergene haplotypes for the long-term fate of balanced polymorphisms governed by supergenes.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularAnimalsBiological EvolutionBiological MimicryGenetic StructuresHaplotypesInsectaPolymorphism, GeneticRecombination, Geneticbalancing selectiondegenerationhemizygosityinversionrecombination suppressionstructural variation

Identifiers

PMID33739390
PMCPMC8160319
OpenAlexW3117706582

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.