Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33739297›Full record

ArticleJMIR research protocols2021

Intermittent Versus Continuous Low-Energy Diet in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: Protocol for a Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.

Sarah McDiarmid, Michelle Harvie, Rhona Johnson, Avni Vyas, Azza Aglan, Jacqui Moran, Helen Ruane, Amanda Hulme, Katharine Sellers, Basil Issa

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR research protocols, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sarah McDiarmid *The Prevent Breast Cancer Research Unit, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7668-7860
Michelle Harvie *The Prevent Breast Cancer Research Unit, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9761-3089
Rhona JohnsonDepartment of Endocrinology and Diabetes, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2692-512X
Avni VyasThe Prevent Breast Cancer Research Unit, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7436-4996
Azza AglanGreater Manchester Mental Health Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5756-397X
Jacqui MoranDepartment of Endocrinology and Diabetes, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5248-341X
Helen RuaneThe Prevent Breast Cancer Research Unit, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0114-0123
Amanda HulmeDepartment of Endocrinology and Diabetes, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9823-0725
Katharine SellersThe Prevent Breast Cancer Research Unit, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0717-5095
Basil Issa *Department of Endocrinology and Diabetes, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5681-2698
Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust · GBGreater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIntensive face-to-face weight loss programs using continuous low-energy diets (CLEDs) providing approximately 800 kcal per day (3347 kJ per day) can produce significant weight loss and remission from type 2 diabetes (T2D). Intermittent low-energy diets (ILEDs) and remotely delivered programs could be viable alternatives that may support patient choice and adherence.

objectiveThis paper describes the protocol of a pilot randomized controlled trial to test the feasibility and potential efficacy of remotely supported isocaloric ILED and CLED programs among patients with overweight and obesity and T2D.

methodsA total of 79 participants were recruited from primary care, two National Health Service hospital trusts, and a voluntary T2D research register in the United Kingdom. The participants were randomized to a remotely delivered ILED (n=39) or CLED (n=40). The active weight loss phase of CLED involved 8 weeks of Optifast 820 kcal/3430 kJ formula diet, followed by 4 weeks of food reintroduction. The active weight loss phase of ILED (n=39) comprised 2 days of Optifast 820 kcal/3430 kJ diet and 5 days of a portion-controlled Mediterranean diet for 28 weeks. Both groups were asked to complete 56 Optifast 820 kcal/3430 kJ days during their active weight loss phase with an equivalent energy deficit. The diets were isocaloric for the remainder of the 12 months. CLED participants were asked to follow a portion-controlled Mediterranean diet 7 days per week. ILED followed 1-2 days per week of a food-based 820 kcal/3430 kJ diet and a portion-controlled Mediterranean diet for 5-6 days per week. Participants received high-frequency (weekly, fortnightly, or monthly depending on the stage of the trial) multidisciplinary remote support from a dietitian, nurse, exercise specialist, and psychologist via telephone or the Oviva smartphone app. The primary outcomes of the study were uptake, weight loss, and changes in glycated hemoglobin at 12 months. An outcome assessment of trial retention was retrospectively added. Secondary outcomes included an assessment of adherence and adverse events. A qualitative evaluation was undertaken via interviews with participants and health care professionals who delivered the intervention.

resultsA total of 79 overweight or obese participants aged 18-75 years and diagnosed with T2D in the last 8 years were recruited to the Manchester Intermittent and Daily Diet Diabetes App Study (MIDDAS). Recruitment began in February 2018, and data collection was completed in February 2020. Data analysis began in June 2020, and the first results are expected to be submitted for publication in 2021.

conclusionsThe outcomes of the MIDDAS study will inform the feasibility of remotely delivered ILED and CLED programs in clinical practice and the requirement for a larger-scale randomized controlled trial.

trial registrationInternational Standard Randomized Controlled Trial Number (ISRCTN) 15394285; http://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN15394285. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/21116.

Indexed as

diabetesdiabetes remissiondiabetic dietintermittent energy restrictionintermittent fastinglow calorie dietlow-energy dietmHealthmobile healthmobile phonesmartphonetype 2 diabetes

Identifiers

PMID33739297
PMCPMC8088860
OpenAlexW3136375361

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.