ArticleInternational journal of stroke : official journal of the International Stroke Society2022
International stroke genetics consortium recommendations for studies of genetics of stroke outcome and recovery.
Article in International journal of stroke : official journal of the International Stroke Society, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- Rationale and design of Low-Frequency REpetitive TRanscranial Magnetic Stimulation Combined with Endovascular Treatment in ACute Ischaemic StrokE (RETRACE II): a randomised double-blind controlled multicentre phase II pilot study.Stroke and vascular neurology · 2026Article
- Review
- Causal assessment of the relationship between diet, lifestyle, and stroke: A two-sample Mendelian randomization study.Medicine · 2025Article
- Associations between admission levels of multiple biomarkers and subsequent worse outcomes in acute ischemic stroke patients.Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism · 2024Article
- Genome-Wide Association Studies of 3 Distinct Recovery Phenotypes in Mild Ischemic Stroke.Neurology · 2024Article
- Scaling behaviours of deep learning and linear algorithms for the prediction of stroke severity.Brain communications · 2024Article
- Article
- Collateral Flow: Prolonging the Ischemic Penumbra.Translational stroke research · 2023Article
- Association of Stroke Lesion Pattern and White Matter Hyperintensity Burden With Stroke Severity and Outcome.Neurology · 2022Article
- Genome-Wide Studies in Ischaemic Stroke: Are Genetics Only Useful for Finding Genes?International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
29 authors at 20 institutions in 10 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Numerous biological mechanisms contribute to outcome after stroke, including brain injury, inflammation, and repair mechanisms. Clinical genetic studies have the potential to discover biological mechanisms affecting stroke recovery in humans and identify intervention targets. Large sample sizes are needed to detect commonly occurring genetic variations related to stroke brain injury and recovery. However, this usually requires combining data from multiple studies where consistent terminology, methodology, and data collection timelines are essential. Our group of expert stroke and rehabilitation clinicians and researchers with knowledge in genetics of stroke recovery here present recommendations for harmonizing phenotype data with focus on measures suitable for multicenter genetic studies of ischemic stroke brain injury and recovery. Our recommendations have been endorsed by the International Stroke Genetics Consortium.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.