Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33739188›Full record

ArticleJournal of veterinary diagnostic investigation : official publication of the American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians, Inc2021

Data standardization implementation and applications within and among diagnostic laboratories: integrating and monitoring enteric coronaviruses.

Giovani Trevisan, Leticia C M Linhares, Kent J Schwartz, Eric R Burrough, Edison de S Magalhães, Bret Crim, Poonam Dubey, Rodger G Main, Phillip Gauger, Mary Thurn and 11 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of veterinary diagnostic investigation : official publication of the American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians, Inc, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Leveraging and enhancing the value of veterinary diagnostic laboratory data.Journal of veterinary diagnostic investigation : official publication of the American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians, Inc · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Giovani TrevisanVeterinary Diagnostic and Production Animal Medicine, Iowa State University, Ames, IA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4980-526X
Leticia C M LinharesVeterinary Diagnostic and Production Animal Medicine, Iowa State University, Ames, IA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5305-7981
Kent J SchwartzVeterinary Diagnostic and Production Animal Medicine, Iowa State University, Ames, IA.
Eric R BurroughVeterinary Diagnostic and Production Animal Medicine, Iowa State University, Ames, IA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4747-9189
Edison de S MagalhãesVeterinary Diagnostic and Production Animal Medicine, Iowa State University, Ames, IA.
Bret CrimVeterinary Diagnostic and Production Animal Medicine, Iowa State University, Ames, IA.
Poonam DubeyVeterinary Diagnostic and Production Animal Medicine, Iowa State University, Ames, IA.
Rodger G MainVeterinary Diagnostic and Production Animal Medicine, Iowa State University, Ames, IA.
Phillip GaugerVeterinary Diagnostic and Production Animal Medicine, Iowa State University, Ames, IA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2540-8769
Mary ThurnVeterinary Population Medicine, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, MN.
Paulo T F LagesVeterinary Population Medicine, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, MN.
Cesar A CorzoVeterinary Population Medicine, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, MN.
Jerry TorrisonVeterinary Population Medicine, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, MN.
Jamie HenningsonCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS.
Eric HerrmanCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS.
Rob McGaugheyCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS.
Giselle CinoCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS.
Jon GresethVeterinary & Biomedical Sciences Department, South Dakota State University, Brookings, SD.
Travis ClementVeterinary & Biomedical Sciences Department, South Dakota State University, Brookings, SD.
Jane Christopher-HenningsVeterinary & Biomedical Sciences Department, South Dakota State University, Brookings, SD.
Daniel C L LinharesVeterinary Diagnostic and Production Animal Medicine, Iowa State University, Ames, IA.
Iowa State University · USKansas State University · USUniversity of Minnesota · USSouth Dakota State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Every day, thousands of samples from diverse populations of animals are submitted to veterinary diagnostic laboratories (VDLs) for testing. Each VDL has its own laboratory information management system (LIMS), with processes and procedures to capture submission information, perform laboratory tests, define the boundaries of test results (i.e., positive or negative), and report results, in addition to internal business and accounting applications. Enormous quantities of data are accumulated and stored within VDL LIMSs. There is a need for platforms that allow VDLs to exchange and share portions of laboratory data using standardized, reliable, and sustainable information technology processes. Here we report concepts and applications for standardization and aggregation of data from swine submissions to multiple VDLs to detect and monitor porcine enteric coronaviruses by RT-PCR. Oral fluids, feces, and fecal swabs were the specimens submitted most frequently for enteric coronavirus testing. Statistical algorithms were used successfully to scan and monitor the overall and state-specific percentage of positive submissions. Major findings revealed a consistently recurrent seasonal pattern, with the highest percentage of positive submissions detected during December-February for porcine epidemic diarrhea virus, porcine deltacoronavirus, and transmissible gastroenteritis virus (TGEV). After 2014, very few submissions tested positive for TGEV. Monitoring VDL data proactively has the potential to signal and alert stakeholders early of significant changes from expected detection. We demonstrate the importance of, and applications for, data organized and aggregated by using LOINC and SNOMED CTs, as well as the use of customized messaging to allow inter-VDL exchange of information.

Indexed as

AnimalsCoronaviridaeCoronaviridae InfectionsCOVID-19 TestingDisease OutbreaksFecesLaboratoriesReference StandardsSeasonsSwineSwine Diseasesdata integrationdata standardizationenteric coronavirusmonitoringPDCoVPEDVTGEVveterinary diagnostic laboratories

Identifiers

PMID33739188
PMCPMC8120076
OpenAlexW3138771788

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.