Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33739186›Full record

ArticleTrends in hearing

Instrumental Quality Predictions and Analysis of Auditory Cues for Algorithms in Modern Headphone Technology.

Thomas Biberger, Henning Schepker, Florian Denk, Stephan D Ewert

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Trends in hearing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Thomas BibergerDepartment of Medical Physics and Acoustics and Cluster of Excellence Hearing4all, University of Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6314-1914
Henning SchepkerDepartment of Medical Physics and Acoustics and Cluster of Excellence Hearing4all, University of Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany.
Florian DenkDepartment of Medical Physics and Acoustics and Cluster of Excellence Hearing4all, University of Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3490-123X
Stephan D EwertDepartment of Medical Physics and Acoustics and Cluster of Excellence Hearing4all, University of Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Smart headphones or hearables use different types of algorithms such as noise cancelation, feedback suppression, and sound pressure equalization to eliminate undesired sound sources or to achieve acoustical transparency. Such signal processing strategies might alter the spectral composition or interaural differences of the original sound, which might be perceived by listeners as monaural or binaural distortions and thus degrade audio quality. To evaluate the perceptual impact of these distortions, subjective quality ratings can be used, but these are time consuming and costly. Auditory-inspired instrumental quality measures can be applied with less effort and may also be helpful in identifying whether the distortions impair the auditory representation of monaural or binaural cues. Therefore, the goals of this study were (a) to assess the applicability of various monaural and binaural audio quality models to distortions typically occurring in hearables and (b) to examine the effect of those distortions on the auditory representation of spectral, temporal, and binaural cues. Results showed that the signal processing algorithms considered in this study mainly impaired (monaural) spectral cues. Consequently, monaural audio quality models that capture spectral distortions achieved the best prediction performance. A recent audio quality model that predicts monaural and binaural aspects of quality was revised based on parts of the current data involving binaural audio quality aspects, leading to improved overall performance indicated by a mean Pearson linear correlation of 0.89 between obtained and predicted ratings.

Indexed as

CuesSound LocalizationAcoustic StimulationAlgorithmsHumansNoiseTechnologyaudio qualityauditory modelshearablesspatial audio

Identifiers

PMID33739186
PMCPMC7983238

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.