Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33739163›Full record

ArticleAngiology2021

Prognostic Impact of Nonobstructive Coronary Artery Disease Detected by Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography.

Daniel Košuta, Borut Jug, Zlatko Fras

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Angiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Daniel KošutaDepartment of Vascular Diseases, 364687Division of Internal Medicine, University Medical Centre of Ljubljana, Slovenia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0707-2029
Borut JugDepartment of Vascular Diseases, 364687Division of Internal Medicine, University Medical Centre of Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Zlatko FrasDepartment of Vascular Diseases, 364687Division of Internal Medicine, University Medical Centre of Ljubljana, Slovenia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0442-6175

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Coronary computed tomographic angiography (CCTA) is a promising technique for ruling out coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients with chest pain. We aimed to investigate the prognostic impact of nonobstructive CAD on CCTA. We retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent CCTA between 2010 and 2016 at our institution. We divided them into 3 groups: (1) patients with no CAD, (2) patients with nonobstructive CAD, and (3) patients with obstructive CAD. We investigated the incidence of the primary outcome (combination of death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, unstable angina, and late revascularization). A total of 989 patients were included: 540 patients had CAD, which was obstructive (≥50% stenosis) in 256 cases. During the follow-up period, 99 events occurred (32 [7%] in patients without CAD, 26 [9%] in patients with nonobstructive CAD, and 41 [16%] in patients with obstructive CAD;

Indexed as

Computed Tomography AngiographyCoronary AngiographyMultidetector Computed TomographyAdultAgedAngina, UnstableCoronary Artery DiseaseDisease ProgressionFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMyocardial InfarctionMyocardial RevascularizationPredictive Value of TestsPrognosiscoronary artery diseasecoronary computed tomographic angiographyprognosis

Identifiers

PMID33739163
PMCPMC8326899

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.