Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33738763›Full record

ArticleAnnals of nuclear medicine2021

Preoperative prediction of regional lymph node metastasis of colorectal cancer based on

Jiahong He, Quanshi Wang, Yin Zhang, Hubing Wu, Yongsheng Zhou, Shuangquan Zhao

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of nuclear medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Machine learning prediction model for lateral lymph node metastasis in rectal cancer.Frontiers in gastroenterology (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. More than meets the eye: 2-[European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2024
    Article
  11. Clinical application ofJapanese journal of radiology · 2024
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Radiomics in colorectal cancer patients.World journal of gastroenterology · 2023
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jiahong HeDepartment of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Shenzhen University, The People's Hospital of Baoan Shenzhen, Shenzhen, 518100, Guangdong, China. he.jia.hong@163.com.
Quanshi WangPET Center, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510515, Guangdong, China.
Yin ZhangPET Center, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510515, Guangdong, China.
Hubing WuPET Center, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510515, Guangdong, China.
Yongsheng ZhouDepartment of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Shenzhen University, The People's Hospital of Baoan Shenzhen, Shenzhen, 518100, Guangdong, China.
Shuangquan ZhaoDepartment of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Shenzhen University, The People's Hospital of Baoan Shenzhen, Shenzhen, 518100, Guangdong, China.
Shenzhen University · CNSouthern Medical University · CNNanfang Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo establish and validate a regional lymph node (LN) metastasis prediction model of colorectal cancer (CRC) based on

methodsA total of 199 colorectal cancer patients underwent pre-therapy diagnostic

resultsThe CRC patients were divided into a training set (n = 144) and a test set (n = 55). Two radiomic features were selected to build the Rad-score. Five machine-learning algorithms including logistic regression, support vector machine (SVM), random forest, neural network and eXtreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) were used to established models. Among the five machine-learning models, logistic regression (AUC 0.866, 95% CI 0.808-0.925) and XGBoost (AUC 0.903, 95% CI 0.855-0.951) models performed the best. In the training set, the AUC of these two models were significantly higher than that of the LN metastasis status reported by

conclusionIn this study, five machine-learning models for preoperative prediction of regional LN metastasis of CRC based on

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsFluorodeoxyglucose F18Lymphatic MetastasisMachine LearningPositron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyAdultAgedFemaleHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMaleMiddle AgedPreoperative PeriodFluorodeoxyglucose F18Colorectal cancerMachine learningPET/CTRadiomicsRegional LN metastasis

Identifiers

PMID33738763
OpenAlexW3138182816

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.