Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33738681›Full record

ArticleJournal of assisted reproduction and genetics2021

Frozen-thawed embryo transfers: time to adopt a more "natural" approach?

Bruce D Pier, Logan M Havemann, Alexander M Quaas, Ryan J Heitmann

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05215119 (Comparison of Immediate With Delayed Natural Cycle Frozen Embryo Transfers From Freeze-all-IVF Cycles), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05215119 completednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Comparison of Immediate With Delayed Natural Cycle Frozen Embryo Transfers From Freeze-all-IVF Cycles: a Randomized Control Trial of First Frozen Embryo Transfers

TypeobservationalSponsorAntalya IVFRan2022 to 2025Enrolled818ConditionsClinical PregnancyArmsnatural cycle endometrial preparation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Bruce D PierDivision of Reproductive Medicine, Madigan Army Medical Center, Tacoma, WA, USA. bruce.d.pier3.mil@mail.mil.
Logan M HavemannDivision of Reproductive Medicine, Madigan Army Medical Center, Tacoma, WA, USA.
Alexander M QuaasDivision of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, University of California, San Diego, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9644-2115
Ryan J HeitmannCenter for Reproductive Medicine, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The increasing use of frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET) cycles has magnified the focus on endometrial preparation protocols in assisted reproduction. Emerging evidence suggests that natural cycle (NC) FETs are associated with improved outcomes, and that providers should consider increasing the utilization of NC FET at the expense of the currently favored artificial cycle (AC) FET as primary method for endometrial preparation.

Indexed as

AdultCryopreservationEmbryo TransferEndometriumFemaleHumansPregnancyPregnancy RateReproductive Techniques, AssistedAssisted reproductive technology (ART)Frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET)In-vitro fertilization (IVF)Natural frozen-thawed embryo transfer

Identifiers

PMID33738681
PMCPMC8417159

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.