Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33738630›Full record

ArticleWiener medizinische Wochenschrift (1946)2022

Hydrops fetalis with isolated massive ascites in a preterm neonate with rhesus disease.

Nasenien Nourkami-Tutdibi, Martina Geipel, Gabriele Meyberg-Solomayer, Zoltan Takacs, Sascha Meyer

Open access · hybridAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Wiener medizinische Wochenschrift (1946), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 97% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nasenien Nourkami-TutdibiHospital for General Pediatrics and Neonatology, Saarland University Medical Center, 66421, Homburg/Saar, Germany. nasenien.nourkami@uks.eu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4240-1868
Martina GeipelHospital for General Pediatrics and Neonatology, Saarland University Medical Center, 66421, Homburg/Saar, Germany.
Gabriele Meyberg-SolomayerHospital of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Reproductive Medicine, Saarland University Medical Center, Homburg/Saar, Germany.
Zoltan TakacsHospital of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Reproductive Medicine, Saarland University Medical Center, Homburg/Saar, Germany.
Sascha MeyerHospital for General Pediatrics and Neonatology, Saarland University Medical Center, 66421, Homburg/Saar, Germany.
Saarland University · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Significant progress in prenatal care has decreased the incidence of rhesus incompatibility, which may result in hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn (HDFN). This case report describes an unusual presentation of HDFN in a preterm infant delivered by caesarean section with isolated massive abdominal fluid collection as the leading clinical sign in addition to severe anemia. The immediate drainage of ascites provided transient clinical stabilization with improved pulmonary function in the delivery suite. After admission to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU), HDFN treatment was initiated. This case report shows the importance of adequately trained staff including neonatologists, pediatricians and NICU nurses in the delivery suite to provide neonatal intensive care for HDFN.

Indexed as

Erythroblastosis, FetalHydrops FetalisAscitesCesarean SectionFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornInfant, PrematurePregnancyAnemiaErythroblastosis fetalisHemolytic disease of newbornJaundice, neonatalNeonatal intensive care units

Identifiers

PMID33738630
PMCPMC9550722
OpenAlexW3136954443

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.