Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33738607›Full record

ArticleZeitschrift fur Gerontologie und Geriatrie2021

Laying the foundation for an ICF core set for community dwelling older adults in primary care: an expert survey.

Susann Gotthardt, Johanna Tomandl, Anina Hoefle, Thomas Kuehlein, Stephanie Book, Elmar Graessel, Michael Talaska, Cornel Sieber, Ellen Freiberger

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Zeitschrift fur Gerontologie und Geriatrie, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Susann GotthardtInstitute for Biomedicine of Aging, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Kobergerstraße 60, 90408, Nuremberg, Germany. susann.gotthardt@fau.de.
Johanna TomandlInstitute of General Practice, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Universitätsstraße 29, 91054, Erlangen, Germany.
Anina HoefleInstitute of General Practice, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Universitätsstraße 29, 91054, Erlangen, Germany.
Thomas KuehleinInstitute of General Practice, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Universitätsstraße 29, 91054, Erlangen, Germany.
Stephanie BookCenter for Health Services Research in Medicine, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Schwabachanlage 10, 91054, Erlangen, Germany.
Elmar GraesselCenter for Health Services Research in Medicine, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Schwabachanlage 10, 91054, Erlangen, Germany.
Michael TalaskaInstitute for Biomedicine of Aging, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Kobergerstraße 60, 90408, Nuremberg, Germany.
Cornel SieberInstitute for Biomedicine of Aging, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Kobergerstraße 60, 90408, Nuremberg, Germany.
Ellen FreibergerInstitute for Biomedicine of Aging, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Kobergerstraße 60, 90408, Nuremberg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA holistic biopsychosocial model focused on functioning in individual contexts (environment, task) is better suited to meet the needs of older patients than disease only based models. The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) is the official standard for describing functional health. As the ICF is too detailed to be used in practice, brief core sets have been developed.

objectiveThis study aimed to identify relevant aspects of functioning for older primary care patients from the perspective of healthcare professionals in Germany. MATERIAL AND

methodsAn internet-based cross-sectional expert survey was conducted in preparation for the development of an ICF core set for community-dwelling patients aged 75 years and older. Open-ended questions to identify the most important aspects of functioning and disability in old age were used. Responses were analyzed based on a content analysis approach to identify relevant concepts in the care of the target population. These concepts were then linked to ICF categories according to established linking rules.

resultsA total of 63 experts participated in this survey. Across all responses, 2240 meaningful concepts were identified. A total of 75 ICF categories (4 first level categories, 67 second level categories, 4 code combinations) were identified by at least 5% of respondents and will thus be considered as candidate categories for the final ICF core set. Most of concepts were associated with the environmental factors component. The most frequently identified categories were immediate family and family relationships.

conclusionThis survey provides a list of relevant ICF categories from the experts' perspective and together with other preparatory studies will be used for developing an ICF core set for community-dwelling older adults in primary care.

Indexed as

Independent LivingInternational Classification of Functioning, Disability and HealthAgedCross-Sectional StudiesDisability EvaluationGermanyHumansPrimary Health CareSurveys and QuestionnairesCommunity-dwelling older patientsExpert surveyFunctioningICF core setPrimary care

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.