Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33738601›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2021

Quantitative assessment of HCC wash-out on CT is a predictor of early complete response to TACE.

Marco Fronda, Andrea Doriguzzi Breatta, Marco Gatti, Marco Calandri, Claudio Maglia, Laura Bergamasco, Dorico Righi, Riccardo Faletti, Paolo Fonio

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Quantitative washout in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma undergoing TACE: an imaging biomarker for predicting prognosis?Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Marco FrondaDepartment of Surgical Sciences - Radiology Unit, A.O.U. Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Via Genova 3, 10126, Turin, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1227-9040
Andrea Doriguzzi BreattaDepartment of Surgical Sciences - Radiology Unit, A.O.U. Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Via Genova 3, 10126, Turin, Italy.
Marco GattiDepartment of Surgical Sciences - Radiology Unit, University of Torino - A.O.U. Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Via Genova 3, 10126, Turin, Italy.
Marco CalandriDepartment of Oncology- Radiology Unit, University of Torino - A.O.U. San Luigi Gonzaga di Orbassano, Regione Gonzole 10, Turin, Italy. marco.calandri@unito.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0297-0700
Claudio MagliaDepartment of Surgical Sciences - Radiology Unit, University of Torino - A.O.U. Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Via Genova 3, 10126, Turin, Italy.
Laura BergamascoDepartment of Surgical Sciences, University of Torino - A.O.U. Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, C.so Bramante 88, 10126, Turin, Italy.
Dorico RighiDepartment of Diagnostic Imaging and Interventional Radiology - Vascular Radiology, A.O.U. Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, C.so Bramante 88, 10126, Turin, Italy.
Riccardo FalettiDepartment of Surgical Sciences - Radiology Unit, University of Torino - A.O.U. Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Via Genova 3, 10126, Turin, Italy.
Paolo FonioDepartment of Surgical Sciences - Radiology Unit, University of Torino - A.O.U. Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Via Genova 3, 10126, Turin, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo investigate the predictive value of four-phase contrast-enhanced CT (CECT) for early complete response (CR) to drug-eluting-bead transarterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE), with a particular focus on the quantitatively assessed wash-in and wash-out.

methodsA retrospective analysis of preprocedural CECTs was performed for 129 HCC nodules consecutively subjected to DEB-TACE as first-line therapy. Lesion size, location, and margins were recorded. For the quantitative analysis, the following parameters were computed: contrast enhancement ratio (CER) and lesion-to-liver contrast ratio (LLC) as estimates of wash-in; absolute and relative wash-out (WO

resultsAll quantitatively assessed wash-out variables had significantly higher rates for CR lesions (WO

conclusionsBased on preprocedural CECT, the quantitative assessment of HCC wash-out is useful in predicting early CR after DEB-TACE. Among the different formulas for wash-out quantification, DPAR has the best discriminating ability. When associated, DPAR ≥ 120 and smooth lesion margins are related to relatively high CR rates. KEY POINTS: • A high wash-out rate, quantitatively assessed during preprocedural four-phase contrast-enhanced CT (CECT), is a favorable predictor for early radiological complete response of HCC to drug-eluting-bead chemoembolization (DEB-TACE). • The arterial phase of CECT shows great dispersion of attenuation values among different lesions, even when a standardized protocol is used, limiting its usefulness for quantitative analyses. • Among the different formulas used to quantify the wash-out rate (absolute wash-out, relative wash-out, and delayed percentage attenuation ratio), the latter (DPAR), based only on the delayed phase, is the most predictive (AUC = 0.80), showing a significant association with complete response for values above 120.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, HepatocellularChemoembolization, TherapeuticLiver NeoplasmsHumansRetrospective StudiesTomography, X-Ray ComputedTreatment OutcomeBiomarkersCarcinoma, hepatocellularTherapeutic chemoembolizationTomography, X-ray computed

Identifiers

PMID33738601
PMCPMC8379130

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.