Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33738592›Full record

ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2021

The financial coping strategies of US cancer patients and survivors.

Meredith Doherty, Daniel Gardner, Jackie Finik

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Step forward: how health insurance mitigates financial toxicity in cancer care in Pakistan.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Patient-reported benefit from proposed interventions to reduce financial toxicity during cancer treatment.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Meredith DohertyImmigrant Health and Cancer Disparities, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 485 Lexington Ave, New York, NY, 10017, USA. Dohertym@mskcc.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4229-1136
Daniel GardnerSilberman School of Social Work, Hunter College City University of New York, New York, NY, 10021, USA.
Jackie FinikImmigrant Health and Cancer Disparities, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 485 Lexington Ave, New York, NY, 10017, USA.
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USCity University of New York · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
American Cancer Society 129554-DSW-16-071-01-SWNCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748-51
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeCoping behaviors may play a mediating role in producing the negative health outcomes observed in financially burdened cancer patients and survivors.

methodsExploratory factor and latent class analysis of survey data.

resultsA total of 510 people completed the survey, ages ranged from 25 to over 75 [over half greater than 55 years old (57.8%)]. Most respondents identified as female (64.7%), white (70.8%), or African American (18.6%). A four-factor model of financial coping was revealed: care-altering, lifestyle-altering, self-advocacy, and financial help-seeking. Respondents grouped into three financial coping classes: low burden/low coping (n = 212), high self-advocacy (n = 143), and high burden/high coping (n = 155). African American respondents were at far greater odds than white respondents of being in the high burden/high coping class (OR = 5.82, 95% CI 3.01-6.64) or the self-advocacy class (OR = 1.99, 95% CI 1.19-2.80) than the low burden/low coping class. Compared to respondents aged 65 years and older, those 35-44 were more likely in the high burden/high coping class (OR = 12.27, 95% CI 7.03-19.87) and the high self-advocacy class (OR = 7.08, 95% CI 5.89-8.28) than the low burden/low coping class.

conclusionOne-third of respondents were in the high burden/high coping class. Age and race/ethnicity were significantly associated with class membership. Some coping strategies may compromise health and well-being. Program and policy interventions that reduce the odds that patients will use strategies that undermine treatment outcomes and increase patient use of protective strategies are needed.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PsychologicalNeoplasmsAdultFemaleHumansLife StyleSurveys and QuestionnairesSurvivorsCancerFinancial copingFinancial hardshipHealth disparitiesQuality of lifeSupportive care

Identifiers

PMID33738592
PMCPMC10135417
OpenAlexW3138335464

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.