Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33738563›Full record

ArticleEJNMMI research2021

Intraoperative [

Patriek A G T Jurrius, Maarten R Grootendorst, Marika Krotewicz, Massimiliano Cariati, Ashutosh Kothari, Neill Patani, Paulina Karcz, Monika Nagadowska, Kunal N Vyas, Arnie Purushotham and 1 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EJNMMI research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02666079 (A Multi-centre Clinical Study to Evaluate the LightPath® Imaging System in Wide Local Excision), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02666079 naunknown statusnot on this map

A Multi-centre Clinical Study to Evaluate the LightPath® Imaging System in Wide Local Excision (WLE) for Breast Cancer

TypeinterventionalSponsorLightpoint Medical LimitedRan2017 to 2018Enrolled170ConditionsBreast CancerArmsLightPath® Imaging System.
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Radiation Protection and Occupational Exposure onJournal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Patriek A G T JurriusSchool of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom. patriek.jurrius@kcl.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3706-023X
Maarten R GrootendorstLightpoint Medical Ltd., London, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1260-1976
Marika KrotewiczBreast Cancer and Reconstructive Surgery Clinic, Maria Skłodowska-Curie Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8954-188X
Massimiliano CariatiDepartment of Breast Surgery, University College London Hospital, London, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9129-7644
Ashutosh KothariDepartment of Breast Surgery, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9781-9466
Neill PataniDepartment of Breast Surgery, University College London Hospital, London, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9591-8636
Paulina KarczClinical Department of Endocrinology, Maria Skłodowska-Curie Institute of Oncology, Kraków, Poland.
Monika NagadowskaBreast Cancer and Reconstructive Surgery Clinic, Maria Skłodowska-Curie Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland.
Kunal N VyasLightpoint Medical Ltd., London, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9670-0233
Arnie Purushotham *School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8577-9655
Maria Turska-d'Amico *Oncological and Reconstructive Surgery Clinic, Maria Skłodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Centre and Institute of Oncology, Gliwice, Poland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5050-9399
The Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology · PLKing's College London · GBLightpoint Medical (United Kingdom) · GBUniversity College Hospital · GBGuy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

H2020 Innovation In SMEs 698263
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionIn women undergoing breast-conserving surgery (BCS), 20-25% require a re-operation as a result of incomplete tumour resection. An intra-operative technique to assess tumour margins accurately would be a major advantage. A novel method for intraoperative margin assessment was developed by applying a thin flexible scintillating film to specimens-flexible autoradiography (FAR) imaging. A single-arm, multi-centre study was conducted to evaluate the feasibility of intraoperative [

methodsEighty-eight patients with invasive breast cancer undergoing BCS received ≤ 300 MBq of [

resultsData analysis was performed on 66 patients. Intraoperative margin assessment using FAR was completed on 385 margins with 46.2% sensitivity, 81.7% specificity, 8.1% PPV, 97.7% NPV and an overall accuracy of 80.5%, detecting both invasive carcinoma and DCIS. A subgroup analysis based on [

conclusion[

trial registrationIdentifier: NCT02666079. Date of registration: 28 January 2016. URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02666079 . ISRCTN registry: Reference: ISRCTN17778965. Date of registration: 11 February 2016. URL: http://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN17778965 .

Indexed as

Breast cancerBreast-conserving surgeryFlexible autoradiographyMargin assessmentRe-operation rate

Identifiers

PMID33738563
PMCPMC7973336
OpenAlexW3126583148

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.