Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33738525›Full record

ArticleOecologia2021

The experimental range extension of guppies (Poecilia reticulata) influences the metabolic activity of tropical streams.

Antoine O H C Leduc, Steven A Thomas, Ronald D Bassar, Andrés López-Sepulcre, Keeley MacNeill, Rana El-Sabaawi, David N Reznick, Alexander S Flecker, Joseph Travis

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Oecologia, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 7 institutions in 5 countries.

Antoine O H C LeducPost-Graduation Program in Ecology, Department of Oceanography and Limnology, Universidade Federal Do Rio Grande Do Norte, Natal, RN, 59014002, Brazil. mirabiles@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8471-2114
Steven A ThomasSchool of Natural Resources, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Hardin Hall Room 403, Lincoln, NE, 68583, USA.
Ronald D BassarDepartment of Biology, Williams College, Williamstown, MA, 01267, USA.
Andrés López-SepulcreCNRS UMR 7618, Institute of Ecology and Environmental Sciences Paris (iEES), Université Sorbonne, 4 Place Jussieu, 75252, Paris, France.
Keeley MacNeillDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, 14853, USA.
Rana El-SabaawiDepartment of Biology, University of Victoria, STN CSC, PO Box 1700, Victoria, BC, V8W 2Y2, Canada.
David N ReznickDepartment of Biology, University of California, Riverside, CA, 92521, USA.
Alexander S FleckerDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, 14853, USA.
Joseph TravisDepartment of Biological Science, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, 32306, USA.
Cornell University · USCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRFlorida State University · USUniversity of California, Riverside · USUniversity of Nebraska–Lincoln · USUniversity of Victoria · CAWilliams College · US

Funding

Academy of Finland 295941Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior 88882.305953/2018-01National Science Foundation DEB-0623632
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ecological consequences of biological range extensions reflect the interplay between the functional characteristics of the newly arrived species and their recipient ecosystems. Teasing apart the relative contribution of each component is difficult because most colonization events are studied retrospectively, i.e., after a species became established and its consequences apparent. We conducted a prospective experiment to study the ecosystem consequences of a consumer introduction, using whole-stream metabolism as our integrator of ecosystem activity. In four Trinidadian streams, we extended the range of a native fish, the guppy (Poecilia reticulata), by introducing it over barrier waterfalls that historically excluded it from these upper reaches. To assess the context dependence of these range extensions, we thinned the riparian forest canopy on two of these streams to increase benthic algal biomass and productivity. Guppy's range extension into upper stream reaches significantly impacted stream metabolism but the effects depended upon the specific stream into which they had been introduced. Generally, increases in guppy biomass caused an increase in gross primary production (GPP) and community respiration (CR). The effects guppies had on GPP were similar to those induced by increased light level and were larger in strength than the effects stream stage had on CR. These results, combined with results from prior experiments, contribute to our growing understanding of how consumers impact stream ecosystem function when they expand their range into novel habitats. Further study will reveal whether local adaptation, known to occur rapidly in these guppy populations, modifies the ecological consequences of this species introduction.

Indexed as

PoeciliaAnimalsEcosystemProspective StudiesRetrospective StudiesRiversColonizationEcosystem metabolismEvo-eco feedbacksEvolutionary ecologyRange extensionStream ecologyTropical fish

Identifiers

PMID33738525
OpenAlexW3138874632

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.