Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33738514›Full record

ArticleDer Unfallchirurg2021

[Trauma reha score : How can we define the rehabilitation needs of the severely injured?]

Valentin Rosenhauer, Stefan Simmel

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Der Unfallchirurg, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Valentin RosenhauerOrthopädie, Sana Rehabilitationsklinik Sommerfeld, Sommerfeld, Deutschland.
Stefan SimmelAbteilung für BG-Rehabilitation, BG-Unfallklinik Murnau, Professor-Küntscher-Str. 8, 82418, Murnau, Deutschland. stefan.simmel@bgu-murnau.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A seamless rehabilitation of polytrauma patients starting as early as possible is the primary goal in order to ensure long-term participation and quality of life. In reality, however, there is often still a large time gap between acute care and inpatient rehabilitation, the "rehab hole".The aim of the phase model of trauma rehabilitation is to ensure a complete rehabilitation chain. After acute patient care (phase A) and a potentially required early patient rehabilitation (phase B), trauma rehabilitation should seamlessly continue on to phase C.In order to identify those patients who require specialized phase C trauma rehabilitation before discharge from acute treatment, the DGOU trauma rehabilitation working group suggests a simple assessment. The trauma rehabilitation score (TRS) is based on two parts, a prescreening and a main screening. It supports the trauma surgeon at the end of the acute treatment with the needs-based indications for further rehabilitation and serves as an argumentation aid to the payers of the rehabilitation.In addition to the early rehabilitation Barthel index (FRB) for assessing the need for care and mobility, other relevant characteristics are recorded. From a rehabilitation point of view, a special effort arises from an increased diagnostic and therapeutic needs, through specialist care and treatment in nonorthopedic areas, extensive wound management, pain therapy measures, the provision of aids and special psychological care for the seriously injured.

Indexed as

Multiple TraumaQuality of LifeHumansPain ManagementPatient DischargeRehabilitation CentersAssessmentPhase modelPolytraumaRehab holeTrauma rehabilitation

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.