Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33738487›Full record

Observational studyJournal of pediatric psychology2021

Maintaining Momentum in Infant Mental Health Research During COVID-19: Adapting Observational Assessments.

Stephanie Tesson, Dianne Swinsburg, Nadine A Kasparian

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of pediatric psychology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Stephanie TessonHeart Centre for Children, The Sydney Children's Hospitals Network.ORCID 0000-0002-9650-0696
Dianne SwinsburgHeart Centre for Children, The Sydney Children's Hospitals Network.
Nadine A KasparianHeart Centre for Children, The Sydney Children's Hospitals Network.

Funding

Australia Postgraduate ScholarshipNational Health and Medical Research CouncilNational Heart Foundation of Australia Future Leader Fellowship 101229NHMRC Project APP1081001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding the potential effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on the developing parent-infant relationship is a priority, especially for medically-fragile infants and their caregivers who face distinct challenges and stressors. Observational assessments can provide important insights into parent-child behaviors and relational risk; however, stay-at-home directives and physical distancing measures associated with COVID-19 have significantly limited opportunities for in-person observational parent-infant assessment. To maintain momentum in our research program during the pandemic, we rapidly pivoted to remote, technology-assisted parent-infant observational assessments. In this commentary, we offer a series of strategies and recommendations to assist researchers in adapting observational parent-infant paradigms. We also discuss the benefits, challenges, and limitations of distance-delivered assessments, and offer considerations for clinical service provision and future research during and post the COVID-19 pandemic. .

Indexed as

COVID-19Mental HealthHumansInfantPandemicsParentsSARS-CoV-2COVID-19infancy and early childhoodinfant mental healthparent-child relationshipparentingpsychological functioningresearch design and methodology

Identifiers

PMID33738487
PMCPMC7989424

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.